[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
- To: xml-dev <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 09:28:46 +0100
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xml-dev@xml.org [mailto:owner-xml-dev@xml.org]On Behalf Of
> Paul Grosso
> Sent: 18 April 2000 16:17
> To: xml-dev
> Subject: Re: External Resources: Catalogs, XInclude, XBase
>
[ comments on entity management catalogs ]
> It would be perfectly reasonable for a processor that supports
> catalog use to treat the URI given on an xinclude as it would
> any external identifier and pass it through the catalog processing.
I would that would be useful, it wasn't clear from my reading of
the spec whether this was to be the expected (or allowed) behaviour.
> Perhaps the XInclude spec could make it clearer that the value
> of its href attribute is similar to a system identifier in the
> sense of that associated with the SystemLiteral of production [73]
> in the XML spec so that catalog processing (if any) would occur on
> it too.
I think this would be a useful clarification which will highlight
that xinclude URIs are to be treated in the same manner as other
external identifiers.
> I'm not sure what similar functionality you mean. A packaging
> mechanism (i.e., some way to be able to refer to--and perhaps
> facilitate transmission of--a related set of files) would sure
> be nice. It's on the "future" list of the XML Activity, but at
> the present, there aren't enough cycles to attack the problem.
I meant that a packaging mechanism might need to include
'local (entity management) catalog' to ensure that references
in PackagedDocA to B can be dereferenced to actually point
to PackagedDocB.
This would allow documents to be packaged without any
need to transform their contents.
I'd expect that logically a package would contain a manifest
(whats in the package), and a catalog (linking contents
together). However these might physically be the same file.
A package processor would expect at least a manifest in a
package.
Just musing aloud.
Cheers,
L.
--
Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitates"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|