[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: 17 May 2000 16:53:12 -0400
Charles Wiltgen <lists@wiltgen.net> writes:
> (Apologies if this is so simple to be a stupid question!)
>
> We're using XML in a couple ways in an application we're doing. Is the
> preferred convention to use .xml as the file suffix, or our own suffix
> depending on the flavor?
There's nothing stupid about this question (unfortunately), because
browsers are already starting to look at XML-related extensions. For
example, if a file ends with .dtd, MSIE will assign it a MIME type of
text/xml (which means that it will not display because a DTD is not,
in itself, well-formed XML).
If you want browsers to recognize your data as XML and try to display
it with a stylesheet, choose .xml; if not, choose something different.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|