[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Julian Reschke" <reschke@muenster.de>
- To: "Andrew Layman" <andrewl@microsoft.com>, <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 22:15:48 +0200
Could you please explain what you mean by "very conservative interpretation
of the namespaces spec", and what you plan to change???
jr
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xml-dev@xml.org [mailto:owner-xml-dev@xml.org]On Behalf Of
> Andrew Layman
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 9:04 PM
> To: 'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'; Tim Bray
> Cc: xml-dev@xml.org; connolly@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Irony heaped on irony
>
>
> You could also declare the attribute value as fixed, that, too, would make
> IE5 happy.
>
> (By the way, as mentioned in some earlier threads, the IE5 MSXML
> very-conservative interpretation of the namespaces spec, which
> interpretation is the cause of this trouble, will be changed in
> the next rev
> of the parser.)
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
