[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- To: Burnard Towers <lou.burnard@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>, "xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@XML.ORG>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 10:04:29 -0400
Burnard Towers wrote:
> >This may be adequate for mere document markup,
> >but for processing (document or otherwise), we need to be able to
> >handle every case somehow
>
> Sorry, this doesnt make any sense to me. What's "mere" about document
> markup? and why should it preclude being able to handle every case?
If you just want to mark up an existing document set, then you can have
a system that handles only a subset of possible cases. If you need to
represent the name of just anybody, then you need to have a general
system that will not cough on any naming scheme.
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
- References:
- onomastical
- From: Lou Burnard <lou.burnard@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
- Re: onomastical
- From: Burnard Towers <lou.burnard@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
|