[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- To: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@techno.com>, "xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:12:46 -0400
"Steven R. Newcomb" wrote:
> XLink is going to be a W3C
> Recommendation, and nobody else's. Its canonical expression must be
> W3C's, and nobody else's. Formal expressions of it cannot be regarded
> as a reliable basis for open information interchange if they are not
> blessed by the W3C.
I think the W3C would be happy to publish an informative architectural
DTD for XLink, if somebody concocted one. The definition of XLink
is normative prose, not any kind of formalism.
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
