[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@interlog.com>
- To: xml-editor@w3.org, "xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@XML.ORG>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:41:35 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 24 May 2000, John Cowan wrote:
> Issue PE28:
>
> Currently the XML Recommendation is silent about the handling of
> documents that contain "impossible" bytes. For example, the byte 0xFF
> cannot appear in any UTF-8 encoded document.
This seems to me to be sensible.
It does mean that the parser has to check the encoding, though.
> Issue PE24:
>
> Currently, system identifiers may or may not contain fragment identifiers
> (the string beginning with "#" at the end of a URI reference).
> We are considering changing this language to say that "it is an error" to
> use a fragment identifier.
What about XPointer? #id(simon)
You have to allow fragment ids, and to make them optional, I think.
Lee
--
Liam Quin, Barefoot Computing, Toronto; The barefoot programmer
Ankh on irc.sorcery.net, http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/
co-author, The XML Specification Guide
forthcoming: The Open Source XML Database Toolkit
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
