[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@interlog.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 18:29:50 -0400
"Liam R. E. Quin" wrote:
> This seems to me to be sensible.
> It does mean that the parser has to check the encoding, though.
It has to anyway.
> What about XPointer? #id(simon)
> You have to allow fragment ids, and to make them optional, I think.
They are definitely allowed. The question is, if one is present, is
a parser allowed to ignore it?
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|