[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "David Brownell" <david-b@pacbell.net>
- To: "Rick JELLIFFE" <ricko@geotempo.com>, <xml-editor@w3.org>, <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 15:44:02 +0200
> Instead, I would propose another level of validity "character validity"
> which XML processors should be encouraged, but not required, to support,
> or to support as much as they can. Unlike validity, which sits on top
> of well-formedness, "character validity" sits more-or-less underneath
> well-formedness as XML's soft underbelly.
AAck!! NO!! Unneeded complexity, leading to interop bugs.
- Dave
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
