[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
- To: Ed Hilburn <lan3bra7@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:53:28 +0100
Ed Hilburn wrote:
>
...
> I have a few questions. If I use the "http:" scheme for
> a namespace name URI, does it not imply that I should be
> using the HyperText Transfer Protocol? Yes? Why or why not?
>
I have come up with a personal argument (ie I don't *recall* having seen
it mentioned, though it seems fairly obvious) which helps reconcile me
to this usage, which I also found counter-intuitive:
[1] the point of using domain names is to exploit an existing naming and
authorisation system
[2] in practice people may not have *general* authority over any part of
their organisation's domain namespace, for instance I might be allowed
to place documents in my employers http website at
"public.myboss.com/francis", but not on their ftp or their secure
website addressed by the the same domain and path,
"public.myboss.com/francis"
[3] so in this case the "scheme" prefix simply exists to prevent name
authorisation vacuums or conflicts.
Hope this helps -
Francis.
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|