[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Oliver Becker <obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- To: xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:59:03 +0200 (MET DST)
> I think the bigger problem is that people are seeing "http" and assume that
> something is being retrieved. A Namespace URI simply provides a unique value
> to help avoid issues caused by duplicate element and attribute names across
> disparate markups (Namespace collisions).
Looking at the namespace rec, it says:
"An XML namespace is a collection of names, identified by a URI reference ..."
There's no need to use http-URLs.
Perhaps it's a good idea to define a new adressing scheme which means:
This is a namespace. (There is nothing to retrieve.)
Something like
ns://w3.org
The namespace recommendation doesn't have to change this way.
(Perhaps the examples ...)
Best regards,
Oliver
PS: Don't know the discussion on xml-uri ...
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/
[2] http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes
/-------------------------------------------------------------------\
| ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker |
| --+-- E-Mail: obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de |
| op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker |
\-------------------------------------------------------------------/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|