[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
- To: xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 19:01:48 +0100
At 11:04 AM 6/8/00 -0400, Albert Bupp wrote:
>Greetings Folks,
>
>Can someone please briefly outline which parsers, if any, currently (or in
>the near future will) support validation for schema syntaxes other than the
>DTD syntax? Or is it expected that applications will themselves have to
>implement this validation?
>
>My apologies if this represents an irritating newbie question.
Not in the slightest! Questions like this have several spinoffs:
- they refresh the memories of people like me.
- they often spark off fundamental discussions of real value
- they catalyse the community into action - to generate tools where no
tools existed before. Or to revitalise interest. Thus I strongly support
the XSL-FO effort - see separate thread.
I have been very pleased to the see the recent flux of "newbie" questions -
many are deeper than they look.
P.
Peter Murray-Rust. (CML, VHG and XML-DEV)
CMLC and VirtualXML ConCourse: http://www.cmlconsulting.com/
CML http://www.xml-cml.org/
Virtual HyperGlossary http://www.vhg.org.uk/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
