[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 08:39:26 -0500
Precisely. It is a "don't use it if you
don't need it but don't throw it away in
case you do" philosophy. There is a long thread
in Robin Cover's OASIS page on this
and many of the other subjects that
this poster brings up. I humbly submit
that while all questions are welcome, it
is also a good thing to review the archived
material that Robin maintains for basic
XML questions. Keep in mind that XML as
a meta language has to meet a bewildering
array of requirements for applications, and
because of that, Tim's "just small enough"
is on the money.
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Kay Michael [mailto:Michael.Kay@icl.com]
> do most of you out there use element-based or
> attribute-based xml? why?
Beginners always ask this question.
Those with a little experience express their opinions passionately.
Experts tell you there is no right answer.
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
