[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:07:22 -0500
I also assume they will do both things you mention
(upgrade and make it compatible with DR) and
technically, this can be handled. The problem is
in introducing the technology to markets and vendors that
aren't familiar with it and using it as a contract
vehicle. Explaining to them that that was then
and this is now is always a chore. "But you said..."
<whine>This is the familiar chasm for early
adopters and mainstream users. I am hoping for
sooner-than-later support to avoid climbing a wall
on the other side of the chasm while escaping
the arrow-enabled natives on this side.</whine>
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Lisa Rein [mailto:lisarein@finetuning.com]
You know, I admit i've been in a hole writing my book for a few months,
so maybe microsoft has made some kind of retraction I missed, but it was
my understanding that microsoft was going to implement and support the
W3C XML Schema language as soon as it was complete.
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|