[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
- To: "'xml-dev@xml.org'" <xml-dev@XML.ORG>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:40:17 -0600
Roger Costello wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Question 3.
> >
> > Consider a respository of namespaces (and the elements
> associated with
> > the namespaces). For managing things it might be easier to have one
> > namespace for the collection than separate namespaces. Any
> > thoughts on
> > this?
> >
>
This is the type of scenario that motivated my comment (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000AprJun/0159.html) that became LC-117 on the last call issues.
In addition, by having the document specify individual resources for each namespace,
there is no mechanism for a schema designer to enforce that any expectations
about the elements that he has specifically included from other namespaces
which basically makes the uri on the import a joke.
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
