[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Matt Sergeant <matt@sergeant.org>
- To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 00:02:31 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Jonathan Borden wrote:
> alternatively, one could wrap the filesystem in a DOM/XPath accessor and let
> the filesystem code perform the access checks for you. I think it would take
> less code to wrap the filesystem *BUT* one could always munge Xerces to
> provide ACL behavior.
>
> My gut feeling is that using a filesystem designed for lots of small files
> will give the proper level of concurrency and access control. Which do y'all
> think would be the most efficient?
Concurring with Walter, it has to be some sort of DBMS. I was merely
suggesting XPath as the matching language.
--
<Matt/>
Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists
Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions
Email for training and consultancy availability.
http://sergeant.org | AxKit: http://axkit.org
|
