[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>,"xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:15:00 -0400
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> In the case of the Infoset, I find the reductionism distressing. Although
> the specification certain acknowledges that something is lost, it also
> describes itself as:
>
> >a description of the information available in a well-formed XML document
> [XML].
>
> That's fine - except that the Infoset is the only 'canonical' description
> available, and a large chunk of information is excluded from the Infoset,
> presumably never to return.
Entity information is available. Character references are lost, it is true.
If you want them back, shout now.
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
|