xml-dev - RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft

RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
To: aarons@develop.com, Xml-Dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 20:18:57 -0400

At 04:27 PM 8/2/00 -0600, Aaron Skonnard wrote:
>Once XSD and XInclude are done, DTDs are dead weight for the Infoset. It's
>really about the fundamental abstractions that we can infer from XML 1.0 +
>Namespaces in light of our current direction.

Whose current direction?

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
  - From: Aaron Skonnard <aarons@develop.com>

References:
- Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final Review Draft)
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
  - From: Aaron Skonnard <aarons@develop.com>

Prev by Date: Re: groves vs. Groves was: Re: Why the Infoset?
Next by Date: Re: groves vs. Groves was: Re: Why the Infoset?
Previous by thread: RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
Next by thread: RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS