OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: groves vs. Groves was: Re: Why the Infoset?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
  • To: "xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@xml.org>
  • Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 20:22:05 -0400

At 05:57 PM 8/2/00 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>> What we need is a common language for the specification of XML subsets
>> (grove plans), from the full fidelity XML property set.
>I think the idea of creating a formalism for specifying subsets of the
>is a very plausible one, and if the Infoset ever gets out the door I will
>think about the problem.

I think I'm with Jonathan - his separating grove plans from the 'full
fidelity XML property set' seems like the right direction.  I'm not quite
sure if John Cowan is planning here to subset the Infoset further, or to
describe the Infoset as a subset from the ISO SGML property set...

I like option 2 better there.

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS