Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Richard Lanyon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 10:26:14 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Aaron Skonnard wrote:
> What we really need is the next version of XML ( Infoset + XML 1.0 - DTDs +
> Namespaces + XBase/XInclude + XML Schemas ).
And don't forget XLink as well.
I think the real point with the Infoset is not that it's a grove plan
of XML, but that it expresses a particular view of what are the
"really important" bits of the whole XML + Namespaces + Xfoo standards
collection, in a way which fits with the DOM and/or SAX that most
people are using to process this stuff. Issuing a new version of XML
with all the Xfoo standards added might not work, as it could quite
easily prevent XML being a subset of SGML.
Richard Lanyon (Software Engineer) | "The medium is the message"
XML Script development, | - Marshall McLuhan
DecisionSoft Ltd. |