Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Jonathan Borden <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 17:07:22 -0400
Jonathan Borden wrote:
> I have no problem with what the Infoset is trying to accomplish as a subset
> of XML 1.0 + Names (just as I have no problem with what Common XML etc are
> trying to accomplish), but this activity needs to come from a complete base
> down to X,Y or Z subset each of which are useful.
"Needs to" = "must", and there is no "must" about it. It "may" be done
that way, and it *has* been done that way. I have no interest in recreating
the SGML Property Set, nor even an XML-specific ultra-low-level property set.
As I said, those who want the former know where to get it, and those
who want the latter now know where to get it too.
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)