[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David DS Barnes <d.d.barnes@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 18:17:51 +0000
Aw, you make me feel dupid,
because I thought he was touching on related issues:
maybe not so enlightened, maybe more cynical,
but not impertinent questions?
Rather than merely making a "stupid article" section,
why not siphen off the points made in articles
(good or bad, well- or ill-informed),
and suggest an alternative (world/) view
that way, allcomers are given a handle
-- at their own level --
on what are:
experienced realities
projected problems
intentions and visions
hopefully then more people are boot-strapped to enlightened thinking
and the signal::noise ratio,
and the opinion-amplitude 8)
are greatly improved...
Lisa Rein wrote:
>
> This one has my vote:
>
> http://www.business2.com/content/magazine/breakthrough/2000/09/15/18549
>
> it's from this months Business 2.0. And it's written by a professor of
> new media at hunter college in NY. Which shows that even professors
> sometimes don't do their homework. I guess this guy thought he was so
> smart, he didn't need to be bothered with the facts.
>
> I am putting together a "Stupid XML Article" section on my website in
> response to this garbage masquerading as press. Especially after the AP
> wire scare last summer (the whole "Europe votes no on XML" thing),
> something has to be done.
>
> Please forward your favorite (most hated?) stupid XML article to me
> privately if anyone wants to participate. Anonymously or otherwise.
>
> thanks,
>
> lisa
David
--
David DS Barnes
mechanical eng,imperial college | t:0207 594 7181
exhibition rd, london, sw7 2bx | f:0207 594 7127
|
