Now I'm *really* confused.
Deprecating templates in XSLT would be more like deprecating
functions in Java altogether - templates are very much at the core of the
language. Why would you want to do that? What would you replace it with? Would
it still be XSLT in any meaningful way if you did this?
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim
McCune
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Sent: 10/5/00 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: Deprecating
XSLT templates
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The same way you would deprecate a method in Java.
Sorry, I didn't
consider the non-programmers
here.
- -----Original Message-----
From:
Peter S. Housel [mailto:housel@home.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 12:12 PM
To:
xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: Deprecating XSLT
templates
Tim McCune <timm@channelpoint.com> wrote:
> The subject line sort of says it all. Has anyone
given any thought
> to this? The only thing
we've come up with so far is sticking some
>
<xsl:message>s in them.
I can't make heads or tails out of the subject line. Do
you want to
"express disapproval of", "play down", or
"disparage" XSLT templates?
Are
you trying to compute your income taxes, and need to "lower
their
price or
estimated
value"?
Cheers,
- -Peter S.
Housel- housel@acm.org http://members.home.com/housel/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version:
PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOdzMfNUPOr8a7vy5EQJhzgCdG2eJyyQRH9yffqf3aIGfknFqKNsAoP+o
/HL2ssQceMPE9ZPdeUXxPNDb
=niWF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
