Last updated: Sun Mar 16 17:13:07 2003
1023 messages (listed by date and indexed by thread) | Date Index

• Re: e-mail dtds, Jack Park
• ISPs that refuse to support text/xml, Heikki Toivonen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ISPs that refuse to support text/xml, Mike Brown
• RE: tabs to indent for pretty-printing (is it correct?), David Valera
  • RE: tabs to indent for pretty-printing (is it correct?), David Megginson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: tabs to indent for pretty-printing (is it correct?), Sean McGrath
  • RE: tabs to indent for pretty-printing (is it correct?), David Valera
    • RE: tabs to indent for pretty-printing (is it correct?), David Megginson
  • RE: tabs to indent for pretty-printing (is it correct?), David Valera
  • RE: tabs to indent for pretty-printing (is it correct?), Paul Grosso
  • RE: tabs to indent for pretty-printing (is it correct?), Wayne Steele
• XML for Online Games, Christopher Allen - Lists
  • Re: XML for Online Games, Marcus Carr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML for Online Games, Linda van den Brink
  • RE: XML for Online Games, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML for Online Games, David Megginson
    • RE: XML for Online Games, Leigh Dodds
  • RE: XML for Online Games, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML for Online Games, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML for Online Games, Sam Hunting
  • RE: XML for Online Games, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML for Online Games, Joshua Allen
• RE: Community help on W3C XML Schemas, Michael Brennan
• Problems using XDR, Velasco Herrero, Jose Antonio
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Problems using XDR, Derek Denny-Brown
• [Zvon] CSS2 for XML tutorial can be viewed from any browser, Miloslav Nic
• a nice demo page for XPath, Jean-Marc Vanel
• Research Positions in Edinburgh: XML Technologies and Applications, Henry S. Thompson
• tabs to indent for pretty-printing, Imran Rashid
• OPML parser in Squeak, Bruce ONeel
• ebXML/UDDI/Web Services, Schema, futures (panels at XML DevCon 2000,San Jose), KenNorth
• duplicate messages, xml-dev-help
  • Re: duplicate messages, Daniel Barclay
    • Re: duplicate messages, Ian Graham
      • e-mail dtds, K. Ari Krupnikov
• foo:space instead of xml:space?, Mike Brown
  • Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?, John Cowan
    • Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?, Norman Walsh
  • Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?, Tim Bray
    • Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?, Tim Bray
      • Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?, Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: foo:space instead of xml:space?, Andrew Layman
  • Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?, Wayne Steele
• Must DTDs constrain order?, Evan Lenz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Must DTDs constrain order?, Michael Rossi
    • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Joe English
    • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Soumitra Sengupta
    • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Rick JELLIFFE
  • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Wayne Steele
    • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Tim Bray
      • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Evan Lenz
      • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, David Megginson
      • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Tim Bray
      • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: Must DTDs constrain order?, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: Must DTDs constrain order?, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Rick JELLIFFE
  • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?, Wayne Steele
• XML Schemas: even more complex than Java, Arnaud Sahuguet
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schemas: even more complex than Java, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Jonathan Borden
      • Global attributes (was Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Global attributes (was Mapping XHTML to XLink via ArchitecturalForms), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Daniel Barclay
    • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Steven R. Newcomb
    • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, David Megginson
      • RE: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Ian Graham
      • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Daniel Barclay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Default time zone for XML Schema date/time data types, Michael Brennan
• Is there a way to search xml-dev mailing list archive?, rohit srivastava
  • Re: Is there a way to search xml-dev mailing list archive?, Michel Rodriguez
  • Re: Is there a way to search xml-dev mailing list archive?, Michael Smith
• New working draft of XInclude published, Paul Grosso
• How to declare a param which name is in a XML file?, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
  • Re: How to declare a param which name is in a XML file?, Daniel Barclay
• Extract an empty DOM from its Schema, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
• Concurrency on XML files, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
  • Re: Concurrency on XML files, Ronald Bourret
• More XML news your customers will be telling you about, Joshua Allen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: More XML news your customers will be telling you about, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• SAX2/Java: Known Bugs, David Megginson
  • Re: SAX2/Java: Known Bugs, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: SAX2/Java: Known Bugs, David Megginson
      • Re: SAX2/Java: Known Bugs, Daniel Barclay
• RE: Who will choose the winner?, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Who will choose the winner?, Bill la Forge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Who will choose the winner?, Hodder, Ed
  • RE: Who will choose the winner?, Joshua Allen
    • Community help on W3C XML Schemas, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: Community help on W3C XML Schemas, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Community help on W3C XML Schemas, Henry S. Thompson
• Who will choose the winner? (was RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name), Mike.Champion
• Compressability (WAS RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Compressability (WAS RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name), Martin Bryan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Compressability (WAS RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Compressability (WAS RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name), Martin Bryan
  • RE: Compressability (WAS RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Steven R. Newcomb
  • RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Ed Staub
  • RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• simple XPath question, Richard Lanyon
  • RE: simple XPath question, Aaron Skonnard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: simple XPath question, clark.evans@softwareag-usa.com
• Data Binding article: IBM dW, Jeffrey I Condon/Cupertino/IBM
• a handy DTD utility, Bob Stayton
• Self-installing version of XSV available for WIN32, Henry S. Thompson
  • XML Schemas: the wrong name, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Steven R. Newcomb
      • Re: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Steven E. Harris
      • Re: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Steven R. Newcomb
    • Re: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Rick JELLIFFE
    • RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name, Don Park
• XML Schema goes to Candidate Recommendation status, Henry S. Thompson
• DNS problems, Karl Best
  • Message not available
    • Re: DNS problems, Daniel Veillard
• saxon:output solved, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
• saxon:output, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: saxon:output, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
• XML Schema of XGMML (update), puninj
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • XML Schema of XGMML (update), puninj
• XML Schema spec status, Yimin Zhu
  • Re: XML Schema spec status, sam th
  • Re: XML Schema spec status, Henry S. Thompson
  • Message not available
    • Re: XML Schema spec status, Edd Dumbill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML Schema spec status, Leonor Ciarlone
  • RE: XML Schema spec status, David Valera
  • RE: XML Schema spec status, Biron,Paul V
• Re: AW: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Sam Hunting
• Frameworks for implementation of XML-based DSLs, Jose Luis Sierra Rodriguez
• XML, Word & Java, Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)
  • Re: XML, Word & Java, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML, Word & Java, Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)
    • RE: XML, Word & Java, Thierry Bezecourt
    • RE: XML, Word & Java, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: XML, Word & Java, Eric Hellman
  • RE: XML, Word & Java, Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)
    • RE: XML, Word & Java, Jakob Fix
• thanks to all, for your help, Marco Silva
• Xerces, Andre X Malagodi
• RE: Semantic Web (Re: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of A I, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• ANN: Subscription for Unicorn XML Print Server, Academic Edition, Alexey Gokhberg
• Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Simon St.Laurent
      • AW: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Julian Reschke
  • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Tim Bray
    • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Simon St.Laurent
      • W3Cs new policy of standardizing (Re: Schema at XML namespace URI tochange), Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: W3Cs new policy of standardizing (Re: Schema at XML namespace URIto change), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, John Cowan
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Simon St.Laurent
      • AW: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Julian Reschke
      • Re: AW: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Tim Bray
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Rick JELLIFFE
      • RE: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Ian Graham
      • Message not available
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Henry S. Thompson
      • RE: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change, John Cowan
• Where begin in XML, Marco Silva
• I'm new developer in XML-Java, Marco Silva
  • Re: I'm new developer in XML-Java, Bill la Forge
  • Re: I'm new developer in XML-Java, Anatole Tartakovsky
• A beginning to a Soft Landing for the Semantic Web, Dave Winer
• Re: Soft Landing, Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Soft Landing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Soft Landing, Dave Winer
  • RE: Soft Landing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Soft Landing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Soft Landing, Joshua Allen
  • RE: Soft Landing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Soft Landing, John Cowan
      • Re: Soft Landing, KenNorth
  • RE: Soft Landing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Soft Landing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Soft Landing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Soft Landing, Carol Ellerbeck
  • RE: Soft Landing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Soft Landing, Carol Ellerbeck
  • RE: Soft Landing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Validation of a modification to a DOM tree, Denis Jaccard
  • Message not available
    • Re: Validation of a modification to a DOM tree, Daniel Veillard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Validation of a modification to a DOM tree, Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM
• IXMLDOMNode and insertBefore, Craig Miller
  • Re: IXMLDOMNode and insertBefore, Curt Arnold
• Re: Storing rounded numbers, in addition to the actual numbers (corrected), Jim Ancona
• Storing rounded numbers, in addition to the actual numbers (corre cted), Tolkin, Steve
• Storing rounded numbers, in addition to the actual numbers, Tolkin, Steve
• Should we care about elements order ?, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Rick JELLIFFE
  • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Tim Bray
      • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Ronald Bourret
    • Message not available
      • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Paul W. Abrahams
      • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Ron Lunde
  • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Tim Bray
    • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Ken MacLeod
  • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Robin LaFontaine
  • RE: Should we care about elements order ?, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Should we care about elements order ?, Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM
  • RE: Should we care about elements order ?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Should we care about elements order ?, Michael Rys
• Semantic Web ---?? Future of Knowledge Technologies, Elledge, Marion
• Re: RDF and Topic Maps was: RE: Services-based automation, Sam Hunting
  • Re: RDF and Topic Maps was: RE: Services-based automation, Jonathan Borden
• RE: XML Schema: Best Practices, Arnold, Curt
• XML to protect free speech, Michael VanBeneden
• Re: Issues with Packaging Application Payloads, Aaron Swartz
• RE: Description of Semantic Web (was Re: Is it just me...), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Description of Semantic Web (was Re: Is it just me...), Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Description of Semantic Web (was Re: Is it just me...), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: On frank discussions of RDF, AI, "The Semantic Web", OLAP, et c., Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• On frank discussions of RDF, AI, "The Semantic Web", OLAP, etc., uche.ogbuji
• DTD Parsing question, Pandya, Atul
  • Java Data Binding spec, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: Java Data Binding spec, KenNorth
      • Re: Java Data Binding spec, Ronald Bourret
  • Re: DTD Parsing question, Ronald Bourret
• RE: Is it just me..., Mike.Champion
  • Re: Is it just me..., Caroline Clewlow
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Is it just me..., Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Is it just me..., Hanson, Jon
  • RE: Is it just me..., Anthony Channing
  • RE: Is it just me..., Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Is it just me..., Sam Hunting
  • RE: Is it just me..., Tim McCune
    • Message not available
      • Re: Is it just me..., Daniel Veillard
• Schema Tutorial, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
  • Re: Schema Tutorial, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Schema Tutorial, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
• Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), uche.ogbuji
• Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realisticproposals to the W3C?), uche.ogbuji
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realisticproposals to the W3C?), uche.ogbuji
• Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), uche.ogbuji
  • Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realisticproposals to the W3C?), Francis Norton
• RE: RDF/XML, Node vs. Edge labeled graphs was: Re: Services-basedautomation, Michael Rys
• [SAX2] BUG in AttributesImpl, Sebastien Sahuc
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [SAX2] BUG in AttributesImpl, Miles Sabin
• How to unsubscribe, etc., Paul W. Abrahams
• Re: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI, Bob La Quey
• RE: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE:Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM
  • Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE:Realisticproposals to the W3C?), Rick JELLIFFE
    • Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE:Realisticproposals to the W3C?), Thomas B. Passin
• How to "query" into a different xml?, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
  • Re: How to "query" into a different xml?, Thomas B. Passin
    • RE: How to "query" into a different xml?, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
• How to extract XSL info from an Xml Document., Ajit Bawa
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: How to extract XSL info from an Xml Document., Ajit Bawa
    • Re: How to extract XSL info from an Xml Document., Steve Muench
• RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Cavre
    • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Robin Berjon
  • Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realisticproposals to the W3C?), KenNorth
    • Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE:Realisticproposals to the W3C?), Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Dave Winer
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bill dehOra
    • Re: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bill dehOra
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bill dehOra
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Cavre
      • Semantic Web (Re: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Soft Landing, Dave Winer
      • RE: Soft Landing, Michael Fitzgerald
      • re: Soft Landing, David Megginson
      • Re: Soft Landing, Joe English
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Jonathan Borden
    • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Rick JELLIFFE
      • RDF/XML, Node vs. Edge labeled graphs was: Re: Services-basedautomation, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Martin Bryan
      • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Martin Bryan
      • RDF and Topic Maps was: RE: Services-based automation, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Martin Bryan
    • RE: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Jonathan Borden
      • RE: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Bill dehOra
    • RE: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Thomas B. Passin
• [Zvon announcement] DOM1 reference, Miloslav Nic
• PL/1 Parser, Pascal Sigg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PL/1 Parser, Wayne Steele
    • Re: PL/1 Parser, Rick JELLIFFE
  • RE: PL/1 Parser, Michael Rys
    • Re: PL/1 Parser, KenNorth
  • RE: PL/1 Parser, Bill Van Valkenburgh
• alphaWorks XML tools OK'd for commercial use, Jeffrey I Condon/Cupertino/IBM
• conclusions on standards, Simon St.Laurent
• Zvon Newsletter, Miloslav Nic
• Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C ?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Services-based automation (WAS RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Jonathan Borden
• RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist ic proposals to the W3C?), Jonathan.Robie
  • Re: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?), Francis Norton
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist ic proposals to the W3C?), Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Robin Berjon
      • Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realisticproposals to the W3C?), Ronald Bourret
      • Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realisticproposals to the W3C?), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realisticproposals to the W3C?), Jonathan Borden
      • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Robin Berjon
  • Message not available
    • Re: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist ic proposals to the W3C?), Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist ic proposals to the W3C?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Mike.Champion
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Jonathan Borden
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?), Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Widening Circles, Jonathan.Robie
• Depicting interdependence relationships in xml, rohit srivastava
  • Re: Depicting interdependence relationships in xml, Rick JELLIFFE
• how do i..., rsanford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: how do i..., Wayne Steele
    • RE: how do i..., rsanford
      • Re: how do i..., Thomas B. Passin
• RE: standards development and community process, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: standards and copyrighted specifications, KenNorth
• Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Mike.Champion
  • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Sean McGrath
  • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Clark C. Evans
    • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Matt Sergeant
      • Message not available
      • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Martin Bryan
    • Message not available
      • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Amy Lewis
  • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Cavre
    • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Cavre
      • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, B.K. DeLong
  • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Ronald Bourret
    • W3C public lists [was: Realistic proposals to the W3C?], Steve Rowe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Francis Norton
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, James Robertson
    • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Mike.Champion
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Jonathan.Robie
  • Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, James Robertson
      • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, sam th
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Joshua Allen
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Eric Bohlman
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Bill dehOra
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, James Robertson
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?, Anthony Channing
• improved writing ..., Arnaud Sahuguet
• RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Miloslav Nic
    • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C?, KenNorth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Paul Tchistopolskii
      • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Anthony Channing
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Sam Hunting
    • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Sean McGrath
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, David Megginson
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Rick JELLIFFE
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Karl Best
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Christopher R. Maden
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Karl Best
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Sam Hunting
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Sam Hunting
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, sam th
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Paul W. Abrahams
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development, Sean McGrath
    • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Message not available
    • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development, Amy Lewis
      • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshineandstandards development, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development, Christopher R. Maden
      • XMLSerializer in Xerces-J, Julian Reschke
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development, Sam Hunting
• How do I unsubscribe?, Singh, Inderbir
• Why Bother With Standards? (Was RE: RELAX to ISO), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• What is a real standard? (Was: RE: standards body parallel), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Problem with XMLTagger, malcolmdbmunro
• ANN: libxml-2.2.5 Gnome XML library, Daniel Veillard
• ANN: "Building Oracle XML Applications" (Book, O'Reilly), Steve Muench
• ANN: Maintenance release of Unicorn XSLT Processor, Alexey Gokhberg
• standards body discussion - would anyone come?, Simon St.Laurent
• Using Namespaces for Validation, Sean B. Palmer
  • RE: Using Namespaces for Validation, John F. Schlesinger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Using Namespaces for Validation, Sam Hunting
• ANN: 4Suite 0.9.1, uche.ogbuji
• Sun StarOffice XML File Format, Robin Cover
  • Message not available
    • Re: Sun StarOffice XML File Format, Daniel Veillard
• another data point - OASIS, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: another data point - OASIS, KenNorth
• more discussions of standards, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: sunshine and standards development, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: sunshine and standards development, Aura Sheffield
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Mike.Champion
    • RE: sunshine and standards development, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: sunshine and standards development, Simon St.Laurent
    • Message not available
      • Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine and standardsdevelopment, Amy Lewis
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandardsdevelopment, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development, Danny Vint
      • RE: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshineandstandards development, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Good Standards Writers Steal, David Megginson
    • Re: sunshine and standards development, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: sunshine and standards development, KenNorth
      • RE: sunshine and standards development, Mike Fitzgerald
      • Re: sunshine and standards development, KenNorth
      • Re: sunshine and standards development, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: sunshine and standards development, Mick Goulish
      • Re: sunshine and standards development, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: sunshine and standards development, Bob La Quey
      • Re: sunshine and standards development, Mick Goulish
      • standards development and community process, KenNorth
      • Re: sunshine and standards development, Tony Graham
      • Re: sunshine and standards development, Rick JELLIFFE
    • Re: sunshine and standards development, Ronald Bourret
  • Re: sunshine and standards development, Eric Bohlman
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Matthew Gertner
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Mike.Champion
    • RE: sunshine and standards development, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Karl Dubost
    • RE: sunshine and standards development, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: sunshine and standards development, Rick JELLIFFE
  • Fw: sunshine and standards development, Sean B. Palmer
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Bill dehOra
    • RE: sunshine and standards development, Matt Sergeant
    • Re: sunshine and standards development, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Bill dehOra
    • RE: sunshine and standards development, Matt Sergeant
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Mike.Champion
    • RE: sunshine and standards development, Matt Sergeant
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: sunshine and standards development, KenNorth
      • XML community public meeting (San Jose, November 13, Doubletree Hotel), KenNorth
      • Now there are two -- discussing standards ( November 13, December 5), KenNorth
  • RE: sunshine and standards development, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [ANN] XSLScript v 0.7, Paul Tchistopolskii
• minInclusive/maxInclusive don't work for float, Ramesh Gupta
  • RE: minInclusive/maxInclusive don't work for float, John F. Schlesinger
• standards body parallel, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: standards body parallel, Michael J. Fitzgerald
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: standards body parallel, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: standards body parallel, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: standards body parallel, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: standards body parallel, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: standards body parallel, David Megginson
  • RE: standards body parallel, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: standards body parallel, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: standards body parallel, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: standards body parallel, Simon St.Laurent
      • Message not available
      • Re: standards body parallel, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: standards body parallel, Simon St.Laurent
      • Message not available
      • Re: standards body parallel, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: standards body parallel, Simon St.Laurent
      • Message not available
      • Re: standards body parallel, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: standards body parallel, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: standards body parallel, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: standards body parallel, Paul Tchistopolskii
      • Re: standards body parallel, Christopher R. Maden
      • Re: standards body parallel, KenNorth
      • Is it just me..., Tim Bray
      • Re: Is it just me..., Paul Tchistopolskii
      • Re: Is it just me..., Ann Navarro
      • Description of Semantic Web (was Re: Is it just me...), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Description of Semantic Web (was Re: Is it just me...), Ann Navarro
      • Re: Description of Semantic Web (was Re: Is it just me...), Robin Berjon
      • RE: Is it just me..., John F. Schlesinger
      • Re: Is it just me..., Ian Graham
      • Re: Is it just me..., Rick JELLIFFE
      • RE: Is it just me..., Didier PH Martin
      • RE: Is it just me..., Ian Graham
      • Re: Is it just me..., Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: standards body parallel, Lisa Rein
      • RE: standards body parallel, Dan Mabbutt
      • Re: standards body parallel, Lisa Rein
  • RE: standards body parallel, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: standards body parallel, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: standards body parallel, Lisa Rein
    • Re: standards body parallel, Paul Tchistopolskii
  • RE: standards body parallel, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: standards body parallel, Jonathan.Robie
    • Re: standards body parallel, Dave Winer
  • RE: standards body parallel, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: standards body parallel, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: standards body parallel, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: standards body parallel, Jonathan.Robie
    • sunshine and standards development, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: standards body parallel, Rick JELLIFFE
  • RE: standards body parallel, Joshua Allen
• xml-stylesheet processing instruction and parameters..., Tim Crook
  • Re: xml-stylesheet processing instruction and parameters..., Matt Sergeant
  • Re: xml-stylesheet processing instruction and parameters..., tpassin
• SAX app, Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)
  • RE: SAX app, Michael J. Fitzgerald
    • RE: SAX app, Michael J. Fitzgerald
  • re: SAX app, David Megginson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SAX app, Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)
• RE: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• New Technology Opportunties at XML 2000 --- Showfloor expanded du e toincreased demand, Elledge, Marion
• c parser performance, Bill dehOra
  • Re: c parser performance, Seairth Jacobs
• XML Schema discussions with Rick Jelliffe, Miloslav Nic
• XPointer reference and tutorial, Jiri Jirat
• Grouping, cgfield
  • Re: Grouping, Ronald Bourret
  • Re: Grouping, tpassin
• Stupid XML articles, Evan Lenz
  • NewsML (was re: Stupid XML articles), David Megginson
• Schema and Implementation experience, Jonathan Robie
• XSLT hierarchy to flat, Lucio Piccoli
• Unnecessary well-formedness constraint, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • Re: Unnecessary well-formedness constraint, Martin Gudgin
    • RE: Unnecessary well-formedness constraint, Justin Lipton
  • Re: Unnecessary well-formedness constraint, Rob Lugt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Unnecessary well-formedness constraint, Hanson, Jon
    • Re: Unnecessary well-formedness constraint, Paul W. Abrahams
  • RE: Unnecessary well-formedness constraint, Wayne Steele
• Cocoon, Anthony.Ettinger
  • Message not available
    • Re: Cocoon, Daniel Veillard
      • XInclude (was Re: Cocoon), Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Cocoon, tpassin
• Abbey National (in the UK) Mortgage XML, COLLINS,Richard
• New XML Rant, Matthew Gertner
• An issue?: Parsers with XML Schema support & reporting errors ininvalid documents, Dylan Walsh
  • Re: An issue?: Parsers with XML Schema support & reporting errorsininvalid documents, Rick JELLIFFE
    • Re: An issue?: Parsers with XML Schema support & reporting errorsininvalid documents, Henry S. Thompson
• Best Practice - Character sets, Paul Spencer
• XML Translator, Han Chock Lee
  • Re: XML Translator, Bob Kline
    • Re: XML Translator, Miloslav Nic
  • Re: XML Translator, tpassin
  • Re: XML Translator, James Robertson
• duplicate enumeratons on attribute definitions, Rob Lugt
• Bring back the Semantic Web! (Was RE: interoperability), Matthew Gertner
• RE: XML Developers Day Call for Presentations --- FIRST AND LAST CALL, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Is Schema Equivalence transitive?, Ramesh Gupta
  • Re: Is Schema Equivalence transitive?, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: Schema Substitutability Is Transitive?, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: Schema Substitutability Is Transitive?, Ramesh Gupta
• XML Developers Day Call for Presentations --- FIRST AND LAST CALL, Elledge, Marion
• Re: RELAX to ISO, Sam Hunting
  • Re: RELAX to ISO, KenNorth
    • Re: RELAX to ISO, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: RELAX to ISO, Robin Cover
      • Re: RELAX to ISO, David Megginson
      • Re: RELAX to ISO, KenNorth
      • Re: RELAX to ISO, Steven E. Harris
      • Re: RELAX to ISO, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: RELAX to ISO, KenNorth
      • (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO, Rick JELLIFFE
      • re: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO, David Megginson
      • Re: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO, KenNorth
      • Meet the authors (book signings at XML DevCon 2000, San Jose), KenNorth
      • Re: Meet the authors (book signings at XML DevCon 2000, San Jose), G. Ken Holman
      • Call for speakers (XML DevCon 2001: London, New York, San Jose), KenNorth
      • Role of incubating consortium, KenNorth
      • Re: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO, David Megginson
      • Re: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO, KenNorth
    • Re: RELAX to ISO, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: ISO and W3C interaction, KenNorth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RELAX to ISO, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RELAX to ISO, KenNorth
  • RE: RELAX to ISO, Mike.Champion
  • RE: RELAX to ISO, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: RELAX to ISO, Murata Makoto
  • RE: RELAX to ISO, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: RELAX to ISO, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: RELAX to ISO, Rick JELLIFFE
  • RE: RELAX to ISO, Dylan Walsh
    • Re: RELAX to ISO, John Cowan
    • Re: RELAX to ISO, Marcus Carr
  • RE: RELAX to ISO, B. Tommie Usdin
  • RE: RELAX to ISO, B. Tommie Usdin
  • Re: RELAX to ISO, rohit srivastava
    • Re: RELAX to ISO, Rick JELLIFFE
    • Re: RELAX to ISO, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: RELAX to ISO, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RELAX to ISO, Rick JELLIFFE
    • Re: RELAX to ISO, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: RELAX to ISO, Bob Kline
  • RE: RELAX to ISO, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RELAX to ISO, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RELAX to ISO, Jonathan Borden
• Terminology Shift: Ban Semantic Web, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Terminology Shift: Ban Semantic Web, COLLINS,Richard
  • RE: Terminology Shift: Ban Semantic Web, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Terminology Shift: Ban Semantic Web, Bob La Quey
• DOM (level 1): moving elements from one document to another, Julian Reschke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: DOM (level 1): moving elements from one document to another, Mike.Champion
    • RELAX to ISO, Rick JELLIFFE
      • SDExpo 2001 West call for speakers, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • RE: DOM (level 1): moving elements from one document to another, David Valera
  • RE: DOM (level 1): moving elements from one document to another, Mike.Champion
  • RE: DOM (level 1): moving elements from one document to another, David Valera
  • RE: DOM (level 1): moving elements from one document to another, Mike.Champion
• Info on how to unsubscribe, Paul W. Abrahams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Info on how to unsubscribe, Michael.Rohde
    • RE: Info on how to unsubscribe, Karl Best
• Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM
  • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, tpassin
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Edward Loh
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Linda van den Brink
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Abel, Scott
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Dave Winer
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Eric Bohlman
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Linda van den Brink
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Linda van den Brink
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Miloslav Nic
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Francis Norton
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Miloslav Nic
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Linda van den Brink
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, tpassin
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Dan Vint
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Miloslav Nic
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Robin Cover
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Miloslav Nic
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, James Robertson
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, James Robertson
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Joe English
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Linda van den Brink
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Jonathan.Robie
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Linda van den Brink
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Miloslav Nic
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Jonathan.Robie
  • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Wayne Steele
    • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Eve L. Maler
  • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM
    • XML as beta-test, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?, James Robertson
• Schema (4/07/00) to DTD Translator?, Ramesh Gupta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Schema (4/07/00) to DTD Translator?, Webber, Andrew
• XML Schema - use of min(max)Inclusive(Exclusive) on some characterbased types, Miloslav Nic
• What does it mean: chronologically less, Miloslav Nic
  • Re: What does it mean: chronologically less, Bob Kline
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: What does it mean: chronologically less, Biron,Paul V
• How Do I Tell the Parser Where DTD Is, Allen Chang
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How Do I Tell the Parser Where DTD Is, Richard Tobin
• alphaWorks: XML4C, WSDL Toolkit, Interface, Parser, Jeffrey I Condon/Cupertino/IBM
• Telecommunications Vocabularies, rohit srivastava
• RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Dave Winer
    • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Joshua Allen
    • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), David Megginson
      • Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), tpassin
      • Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Linda Grimaldi
  • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Sean McGrath
  • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [Smart Transcoder] ST as an Apache module, Miloslav Nic
• XML Schemas: Is it possible require an element contain *non-whitespace* characters., Dylan Walsh
  • Re: XML Schemas: Is it possible require an element contain*non-whitespace* characters., Francis Norton
  • Re: XML Schemas: Is it possible require an element contain*non-whitespace* characters., Rick JELLIFFE
• need suggestions and help with jclark's XT, DenBeste, Orion
  • Re: need suggestions and help with jclark's XT, Barton Stanley
• ANN: CenterPoint/XML 1.7 available, Guenter Obiltschnig
• Standards and their users, Miloslav Nic
  • Re: Standards and their users, tpassin
• content model, David Valera
• XML, 2nd Edition, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: XML, 2nd Edition, James Robertson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML, 2nd Edition, AndrewWatt2000
    • Re: XML, 2nd Edition, Rick JELLIFFE
    • Re: XML, 2nd Edition, Ann Navarro
    • Re: XML, 2nd Edition, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: XML, 2nd Edition, Paul Grosso
• Extended-XLink tutorial, Jiri Jirat
• Obfuscating XML with namespaces, Amy Lewis
  • re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces, David Megginson
    • Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces, Michael Champion
  • Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces, Jonathan Robie
    • Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces, Michael Champion
    • interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Dave Winer
      • Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), David Megginson
      • Message not available
      • RDF news (was Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML withnamespaces)), Edd Dumbill
      • RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Stephen Owens
      • Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Rick JELLIFFE
      • Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces), Dave Winer
• ANN: The new release of Unicorn XSLT Processor, Professional Edition, Alexey Gokhberg
• RE: XML database, Michael Rys
  • RE: XML database, Huaxin Zhang
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML database, Joshua Allen
  • RE: XML database, Mike.Champion
  • FW: XML database, Eckenberger Axel
• [ANN] XSLT-Tool, FAQ, Installer Updates, Joshua Allen
  • XML database, Huaxin Zhang
    • Re: XML database, tpassin
    • RE: XML database, Evan Lenz
    • Re: XML database, KenNorth
      • Re: XML database, KenNorth
• CMS-Vendor list, Dave Winer
• Re: How to Unsubscribe!, Mike Sharp
• Stranded with standards, JDavid
  • RE: Stranded with standards, Didier PH Martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Stranded with standards, JDavid
    • RE: Stranded with standards, Didier PH Martin
• New expat releases and future development plans, James Clark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New expat releases and future development plans, John Cowan
• saving DOM as bytecode in database, Huaxin Zhang
  • Re: saving DOM as bytecode in database, Steve Muench
  • Re: saving DOM as bytecode in database, Opensource (Anders W. Tell)
• [ANNOUNCE] Topic Map Workshop Oct 25-26, Washington, Michel Biezunski
• Less Stupid XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Less Stupid XML, Joshua Allen
  • RE: Less Stupid XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• IBM article: Voice activated Web access (FYI), Jeffrey I Condon/Cupertino/IBM
• Version 2.30 of Perl's XML::Parser, Clark Cooper
• Deprecating XSLT templates, Tim McCune
  • Re: Deprecating XSLT templates, Peter S. Housel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Tim McCune
    • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Evan Lenz
  • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, John Prout
  • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Mike Brown
  • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Tim McCune
  • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Mike Brown
    • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Evan Lenz
  • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Tim McCune
  • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Tim McCune
    • Re: Deprecating XSLT templates, tpassin
      • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Evan Lenz
  • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates, Tim McCune
• RE: Zig-zag, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Got the Point Perfectly ( Was: RE: Missing the Point (was: More Stupid XML Articles)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML per se, Jonathan.Robie
• Using Tidy for XML correction, Linda van den Brink
  • Re: Using Tidy for XML correction, K. Ari Krupnikov
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Using Tidy for XML correction, Aleksi Niemelä
  • RE: Using Tidy for XML correction, Linda van den Brink
• The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, Matt Sergeant
    • Re: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, Richard Lanyon
      • Re: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, David Megginson
      • Re: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, David Megginson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, Jonathan.Robie
    • Re: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, Rick JELLIFFE
    • Zig-zag, Dave Winer
  • RE: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, Steve Boyce
  • RE: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, Michael Brennan
    • RE: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business, David Megginson
• Missing the Point (was: More Stupid XML Articles), AndrewWatt2000
• ANN: UFO - the new release is available, Alexey Gokhberg
• Something worth reading on linking, Edd Dumbill
• RE: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More StupidXMLArticles)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More StupidXMLArticles)), Joshua Allen
  • RE: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More StupidXMLArticles)), Matthew Gertner
  • RE: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More StupidXMLArticles)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More StupidXMLArticles)), Steve Boyce
• How Do I Turn On Validation Locally?, Allen Chang
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: How Do I Turn On Validation Locally?, Allen Chang
• It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More Stupid XMLArticles)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More StupidXMLArticles)), Simon St.Laurent
    • Message not available
      • Re: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More StupidXMLArticles)), Edd Dumbill
      • Re: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More StupidXMLArticles)), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: MoreStupidXMLArticles)), Michael F. Maddox
  • Message not available
    • Re: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More Stupid XMLArticles)), Edd Dumbill
• More Stupid XML Articles, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Not so stupid (was re: More Stupid XML Articles), David Megginson
    • Re: Not so stupid (was re: More Stupid XML Articles), Steve Harris
    • Re: Not so stupid (was re: More Stupid XML Articles), Paul Tchistopolskii
      • Re: Not so stupid (was re: More Stupid XML Articles), Marcus Carr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: More Stupid XML Articles, Dmitri Pavlenkov
    • Re: More Stupid XML Articles, Bob Kline
      • Re: More Stupid XML Articles, John Evdemon
    • Re: More Stupid XML Articles, Paul Tchistopolskii
  • RE: More Stupid XML Articles, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: More Stupid XML Articles, Joshua Allen
    • Re: More Stupid XML Articles, Paul Tchistopolskii
      • Re: More Stupid XML Articles, John Evdemon
  • Re: More Stupid XML Articles, Dmitri Pavlenkov
    • Re: More Stupid XML Articles, Paul Tchistopolskii
    • Dvo WAS: Stupid XML Articles, David DS Barnes
      • Re: Dvo WAS: Stupid XML Articles, Rick JELLIFFE
• RE: OASIS (was Re: Who will maintain SAX?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• SAX2-ext 1.0 final for Java, David Megginson
  • Re: SAX2-ext 1.0 final for Java, Rajiv Mordani
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SAX2-ext 1.0 final for Java, Eldar Musayev
• XML Schema and context-senstive datatyping, Sam Hunting
  • Re: XML Schema and context-senstive datatyping, Rick JELLIFFE
  • Re: XML Schema and context-senstive datatyping, Henry S. Thompson
• RE: GUI XML Editing tools, James Robertson
• Any decent c api for xml?, Chris Brien
  • Re: Any decent c api for xml?, Seairth Jacobs
    • Re: Any decent c api for xml?, Tim Bray
  • Message not available
    • Re: Any decent c api for xml?, Daniel Veillard
• RE: XTech 2001 (was RE: Who will maintain SAX), Elledge, Marion
• SAX and DTD-reading, Philip Arickx
  • Re: SAX and DTD-reading, David Brownell
• expanding parameters in DTDs, Tony O'Keeffe
  • Re: expanding parameters in DTDs, Marcus Carr
    • Re: expanding parameters in DTDs, Christopher R. Maden
  • Re: expanding parameters in DTDs, David Brownell
• Unknown base type error?, Ramesh Gupta
  • Re: Unknown base type error?, Jeff Rafter
• Re: XML/EDI, John Evdemon
• Oasis process, Michael J. Fitzgerald
• Re: SAX2-ext: any more comments?, Matt Jones
• Is there an EDI schema?, JDavid
• deriving by restriction, Ajay K Sanghi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Deriving By Restriction, Lindsey McNerney
    • Re: Deriving By Restriction, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: Deriving By Restriction, Arnold, Curt
• Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Seairth Jacobs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bill dehOra
    • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Michael Champion
      • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Dave Pawson
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Michael Brennan
    • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, KenNorth
      • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, KenNorth
      • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Paul Johnston
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, KenNorth
  • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, John Evdemon
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Karl Best
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Who will maintain SAX? Vote?, Paul Tchistopolskii
    • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Paul Tchistopolskii
      • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, David Megginson
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bill dehOra
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Michael Brennan
  • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Lars Marius Garshol
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bill dehOra
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bill dehOra
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Message not available
      • OASIS (was Re: Who will maintain SAX?), Edd Dumbill
  • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Jon Bosak
    • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Ken MacLeod
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Michael Brennan
    • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, John Evdemon
  • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, David Brownell
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bill dehOra
    • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, David Brownell
      • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Ken MacLeod
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bill dehOra
    • Re: Who will maintain SAX?, Ken MacLeod
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Bill dehOra
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?, Dan Rippel
• Loading xml and xslt problem, Lim BengTat
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
    • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Ajay K Sanghi
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Caroline Clewlow
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Caroline Clewlow
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Jon Cleaver
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, John F. Schlesinger
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Rick JELLIFFE
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Caroline Clewlow
      • Best Content Model Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Rick JELLIFFE
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Paul Spencer
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Paul Spencer
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Ronald Bourret
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Caroline Weller
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Caroline Clewlow
    • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, John F. Schlesinger
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
    • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Paul Spencer
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Caroline Clewlow
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Eve Maler - Sun Microsystems
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Jon Cleaver
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Rick JELLIFFE
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Sam Hunting
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Sam Hunting
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Toivo Lainevool
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Caroline Clewlow
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Toivo Lainevool
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Arnold, Curt
• Problem with sorting data within an xml using XSL, desimonp
  • Open Source XML/Java Portal, Bill la Forge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Problem with sorting data within an xml using XSL, Wayne Steele
• Re: Empty Complex Type; Mixed Content Type, Martin Gudgin
  • Re: Empty Complex Type; Mixed Content Type, Martin Gudgin
    • Re: Empty Complex Type; Mixed Content Type, Ramesh Gupta
      • Re: Empty Complex Type; Mixed Content Type, Martin Gudgin
      • Re: Empty Complex Type; Mixed Content Type, Martin Gudgin