[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Bill dehOra <wdehora@cromwellmedia.co.uk>
- To: xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 15:47:53 +0100
>He's not saying that it should be taken on by W3C to be beefed
>up to be like
>DOM. He's saying that it would be nice for there to be a W3C
>standard like
>SAX to compliment the features of DOM. After all, SAX is an
>ideal choice
>for building the DOM. SAX should be left as it is, and I
>think that most
>people (the W3C especially) understand that.
The W3C aren't ostensibly in the API space: the DOM is a single exception to
that case. I can't see the w3c going any further down that road.
SAX sounds like it belongs on something like sourceforge or just kept on
xml-dev as a ding in sich. Someone will volunteer as benign dictator surely?
Otherwise it will go into commitee with voting and charters and ... yawn.
-Bill de hÓra
|
