Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:55:56 -0500
Context is everything. It is the willingness
of individuals to stay at it that counts. Not
their education, not their place in their society,
but their vision and understanding, and a talent
for seeing the sensitive point to which all other
points are connected. That bit understood makes
means obvious. Once you know how progressions
tend, you can improvise in place. My tilt is
away from rigidity of means and to individual
skill at offering a flower to the Buddha.
It sounds mystic. It isn't. It just works
better in image than long exposition. Ben Franklin
wasn't offering them tobacco. He got them
high as kites and when they got too ripped to remember what they
were arguing about, they argued more creatively. A little
noise, a little laughter, and one guy with a
loaded stash and the willingness of all involved
to stay in a hot smokey stuffy room until the
list was complete. And to come back if not.
Commit to small actions that address
the point of sensitivity and overwhelm corporate
rhetoric. A wasp in the eye of the driver takes
out a two ton vehicle doing sixty miles an hour.
A bowl in the hand of the laughing zealot dispels the
heat of the summer's conference.
Not that the W3C works like that. ISO certainly
doesn't. Context, you know.... and the skill and
willingness of individuals. Those are the keys.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:email@example.com]
Ah, but don't forget to get over the mass mentality of corporate rhetoric
to ensure that the system which emerges is equitable.
You tilt consistently one way, I tilt consistently the other. Hopefully
the list isn't bored by now.
>I point out Ben Franklin as an example of means
>that are often more subtle than a flaming zealot
>can ever manage. A guy with a match and a loaded pipe
>and can do quite a lot with a room full of arguing
Except, of course, in that minor dispute between the hotheads of England
and the hotheads of America, where he wasn't noted for any lack of zealotry.