[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 06:53:20 -0400 (EDT)
Eric van der Vlist writes:
> I begin to think that XML vocabularies should take example on XML
> itself and that when designing a vocabulary one should start by
> defining the infoset (the data model), a canonical form (a very
> strict syntax) before defining one (or more if needed) "user XML
> syntax(es)" and canonization algorithms with reference
> implementation(s).
I know that people hate this distinction, but for data-oriented XML, I
agree that the data model should be designed first, independently of
XML. For document-oriented XML, on the other hand, the XML markup
often is the model.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
|