[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@lexica.net>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 14:41:55 -0700
At 00:42 15-10-2000 -0700, Ronald Bourret wrote:
>3) When Microsoft comes out with a mistake-filled version 1.0, they
>receive a huge amount of flak. (Interestingly, when Open Source software
>does the same thing, people call it an open process. The only difference
>I see is business model.)
Actually this illustrates Simon's point nicely.
An Open Source project is explicitly open. People looking at the interim
fruits of that project largely understand that they're allowed to see this
*precisely* to find the mistakes and help fix them (if only just by
reporting them).
But Microsoft (and other traditional software companies) claim that their
process is superior, and that what's being released is the end result of a
careful quality-controlled process. So people expect the public fruit to
be of superior quality - and it's not.
But the W3C system's explanation is a very simple one: the IETF failed to
get buy-in from the browser vendors in its effort to develop HTML (both 2.0
and 3.0). The W3C was able to get that buy-in, but only at the cost of
closing the process. The alternative, at least as perceived at that time,
was a "best viewed with" world.
As for large companies drowning out smaller ones, at an IETF meeting, every
attendee gets one vote. Larger companies can afford to send more people;
I've seen attempts to stack a vote there. In the W3C, each organization
gets one vote, and no more. I've voted against Microsoft, and my vote
counted exactly as much as theirs; I've voted with them, and my vote was
exactly as powerful as theirs.
Implementation experience *does* count, and large companies can afford
focus groups, user testing, etc. The WGs do listen to that. More
importantly, they listen to the public - a CR *can not* be released until
*every* comment on the public comments list has been responded to. Maybe
the responses aren't satisfactory, but they're published publicly for
everyone to see the WG's reasoning.
-Chris
--
Christopher R. Maden, Senior XML Analyst, Lexica LLC
222 Kearny St., Ste. 202, San Francisco, CA 94108-4510
+1.415.901.3631 tel./+1.415.477.3619 fax
<URL:http://www.lexica.net/> <URL:http://www.oreilly.com/%7Ecrism/>
|