OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   RE: Deprecating XSLT templates

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: Tim McCune <timm@channelpoint.com>
  • To: 'John Prout' <jprout@onepage.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
  • Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 15:43:03 -0600

Title: RE: Deprecating XSLT templates

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I didn't think it would be this hard to understand.  Yes, John Prout
has it figured out.  I'm trying to mark a template that should no
longer be used (thus deprecating it.)  Man.  What's so hard to grok
here? :)

- -----Original Message-----
From: John Prout [mailto:jprout@onepage.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 3:34 PM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RE: Deprecating XSLT templates


Is the question how can we deprecate an individual template in an
XSLT document - i.e. mark that a template should no-longer be used, -
that it's been replaced by something else... I can see some use for
this in the evolution of a transform

- -----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com
[mailto:Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 2:02 PM
To: timm@channelpoint.com; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RE: Deprecating XSLT templates



Now I'm *really* confused.

Deprecating templates in XSLT would be more like deprecating
functions in Java altogether - templates are very much at the core of
the language. Why would you want to do that? What would you replace
it with? Would it still be XSLT in any meaningful way if you did
this?

Jonathan

- -----Original Message-----
From: Tim McCune
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Sent: 10/5/00 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: Deprecating XSLT templates

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The same way you would deprecate a method in Java.  Sorry, I didn't
consider the non-programmers here.

- - -----Original Message-----
From: Peter S. Housel [ mailto:housel@home.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 12:12 PM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: Deprecating XSLT templates


Tim McCune <timm@channelpoint.com> wrote:
> The subject line sort of says it all.  Has anyone given any thought
>  to this?  The only thing we've come up with so far is sticking
> some  <xsl:message>s in them.

I can't make heads or tails out of the subject line.  Do you want to
"express disapproval of", "play down", or "disparage" XSLT templates?
 Are
you trying to compute your income taxes, and need to "lower their
price or
estimated value"?

Cheers,
- - -Peter S. Housel-   housel@acm.org 
http://members.home.com/housel/


- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <
http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBOdzMfNUPOr8a7vy5EQJhzgCdG2eJyyQRH9yffqf3aIGfknFqKNsAoP+o
/HL2ssQceMPE9ZPdeUXxPNDb
=niWF
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBOdz1N9UPOr8a7vy5EQLfTwCfTni/KcdlZ3qVll/IYZj7cpcte7kAoILc
9MkYsR9P7yS0L227indmPglx
=nydo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS