[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:26:09 -0400 (EDT)
Elliotte Rusty Harold writes:
> At 4:23 PM -0400 10/25/00, David Megginson wrote:
> >I've put a list of known SAX2/Java bugs at
> >
> > http://www.megginson.com/SAX/bugs.html
> >
>
> There only seems to be one bug there and it's an implementation bug
> in a helper class, not an API bug. Consequently I'd like to suggest
> that you not call the new release SAX 2.0.1 since that implies (to
> me, at least) that the API has changed. That is, SAX means the
> general API, not a specific implementation of the API. Maybe SAX2
> second edition or SAX2 1.0.1 would make the distinction a tad
> clearer? But the real issue here is distinguishing between a new
> release of the implementation and a new release of the API.
An excellent point. Any other version-numbering suggestions?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
|
