[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:33:49 -0400
/ John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> was heard to say:
| No. The "xml" prefix gets a namespace as a matter of convenience,
| but is itself magic. To assume otherwise would hurt interoperability.
| The same is true of the "xmlns" prefix.
And of any prefix that begins [Xx][Mm][Ll], no?
(I mean, any prefix that begins with 'xml' in any case is by
definition magic and reserved for future use.)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman.Walsh@East.Sun.COM | The stone fell on the pitcher? Woe to the
XML Technology Center | pitcher. The pitcher fell on the stone? Woe
Sun Microsystems, Inc. | to the pitcher.--Rabbinic Sayning
|
