[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@eris.dera.gov.uk>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:47:35 +0100
I agree entirely. We will most definately have achieved something if we can
actually specify efficiency/processor/application relevant advantages to
using a particular option in a particular situation.
Cheers
Caroline
"Roger L. Costello" wrote:
> Oh my, I do hope that it's not a matter of "style". "Style" seems to
> suggest "by intuition", or "by personal preference". My hope is that we
> are developing guidelines to empower a schema designer can make
> intelligent decisions based upon a concrete decision space (i.e., all
> the design alternatives are spelled out, and the pros and cons of each
> design alternative is clearly understood).
>
> However, your point is well taken. We have not clearly spelled out the
> implications of the First, Second, and Third design. Please keep us
> focused until you (everyone) feel(s) comfortable that it is no longer a
> "style" decision, but rather an "engineering" decision. Thanks! /Roger
|