[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>, sam th <sam@uchicago.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:05:41 -0500
Thanks for answering frankly. Sure, we've
all been in those discussions. Unfortunately,
all too often.
But if we know that is why, we seek alternatives
if we have to. What suffers is the binding power
of the spec. After awhile, we find out if the
pedant had the right answer or not.
It isn't perfect and that is why we are pros:
if it succeeds, we bask. If it fails, we burn. :-)
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Ann Navarro [mailto:ann@webgeek.com]
Sometimes there is an easily divulged technical reason. Sometimes it's
because the group final gave in to someone (or several someones) being a
pedantic ass about something. Telling the world THAT doesn't do anyone any
good.
|
