[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Leonor Ciarlone <ciarlone@WORLD.STD.COM>
- To: xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:19:36 -0400
FYI, XML Schema is a Candidate Recommendation as of today.
Anyone care to take a gander or guestimate at how many of the registered
ML's (in August XML.COM counted 250) have been developed in:
a) DTD
b) a version of schema pre-candidate status (i.e. XML Data via Biztalk)
c) RELAX
Leonor Ciarlone
Senior Consultant
CAP Ventures, Inc.
www.capv.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: sam th <sam@uchicago.edu>
> To: Yimin Zhu <yzhu@cephren.com>
> Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:55 PM
> Subject: Re: XML Schema spec status
>
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Yimin Zhu wrote:
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I know we have been waiting for XML Schema spec to become
recommendation
> for
> > > quit some time. Does anyone have any idea what the current status is
> > > regarding this issue?
> > >
> >
> > <quote src="http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/">
> > This is a public working draft of XML Schema 1.0, issued by the XML
Schema
> > Working Group, for review by the public and by members and working
groups
> > of the World Wide Web Consortium.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Although the Working Group does not anticipate further changes to the
> > functionality described here, this is still a working draft, subject to
> > change. The present version should be implemented only by those
interested
> > in providing a check on its design or by those preparing for an
> > implementation of the Candidate Recommendation. The Schema WG will not
> > allow early implementation to constrain its ability to make changes to
> > this specification prior to final release.
> >
> > During the Candidate Recommendation phase, although feedback based on
> > implementation experience is welcome, there are certain aspects of the
> > design presented herein where the Working Group is particularly
interested
> > in feedback. These are designated priority feedback aspects of the
design,
> > and identified as such in editorial notes throughout this draft.
> > </quote>
> >
> > In other words, the expect to be a candidate reccomendation Real Soon
> > Now(tm).
> >
> > sam th
> > sam@uchicago.edu
> > http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
> > GnuPG Key:
> > http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCABD33FC
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> >
> > iD8DBQE59Owqt+kM0Mq9M/wRAhdRAJ4+9/zOv/WQ7UR3d2ObpsXaahg35QCgplfe
> > 21bpyf57yH5GS3FIm/HVy3w=
> > =NyEk
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
>
|
