[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Bill dehOra <wdehora@cromwellmedia.co.uk>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:51:24 -0500
NPR radio ran a satire last night on the evolution
of web sites that do B2B. I almost lost control
of the car in the cloverleaf because I was laughing
so hard. They nailed it precisely. Cluelessness was
a prime theme.
But let's not blow the services-approah off. That
actually works although it may not be as important
to people whose primary experience is web-surfing.
For organizations that need logistical support for
large systems, this kind of technology is ideal
because they have already defined processes in detail.
It is a good basis for requirements because it is NOT a
metaphor. The Semantic Web simply tells me that there
is something to be done involving meaning and leaves
the usual suspects to figure that out. I don't want
to wait for that.
Before people get too far on this, it would be useful
to review XLang and understand how the macro-level
transactions can be designed with the nesting of
the micro transactions. There is a lot to learn
and understand. It isn't automatic, but once
set up, it is highly automated. It absolutely
depends on a solid reliable framework and in fact,
is dangerous without it.
I should have said, I want the pizza service to
get me a pizza, not have the pizza oven looking
up mozarella to determine it is a type of cheese.
The oven might want the cheese bringer to know
that.
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill dehOra [mailto:wdehora@cromwellmedia.co.uk]
"What have buyers been doing for years?" asks Edward McCabe, a B2B
analyst at Merrill Lynch. "Whittling down their preferred-vendor list."
|