[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:30:03 -0400
At 06:47 PM 10/26/00 -0400, Jonathan Borden wrote:
>I read the proposed 'solution' to the problem of XHTML etc links and
>compatibility with XLink (http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink-naming/).
>
>XHTML 1.0 is specified via DTDs as is XHTML 1.1. XLink needs to support this
>W3C recommendation in its current form. Architectural Forms would be a
>fairly straightforward way to solve this problem (and perhaps one of the
>best use cases for AF I've seen -- IMHO).
I think that's a lot of what was intended in the early drafts of XLink:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/WD-xlink-19980303#remapping
When the attribute remapping was dropped in favor of namespaces, new kinds
of conflicts emerged.
Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
