[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Dan Rippel <dan.rippel@xmls.com>
- To: xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 10:49:46 -0400
I would like to throw my name as well as my co-worker Yoshii Russell in the
hat for this.
The two of us have used SAX for a while and are very interested in
participating in this effort.
Thanks,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill dehOra [mailto:wdehora@cromwellmedia.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 5:55 AM
To: xml-dev@xml.org
Cc: 'Eric van der Vlist'; David Brownell; David Megginson; 'Ken MacLeod'
Subject: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
>> >Ok then,
>> >
>> >How about moving SAX into Oasis with three maintainers?
>
>> Or some larger odd number if enough people want it. Or possibly by
>> language implementation?
>
>A larger working group would likely be fine, but I believe the
>original suggestion was to have the minimum necessary people on the
>technical committee to be "official" by OASIS process, and then for
>those three to continue maintaining SAX, in both spirit and practice,
>as it was originally developed here on xml-dev.
Ok, but both the suggestions you quote above are mine. I'm Irish, so 3 is an
allowable magic number :) (as well as very good number for getting things
done). Soon after it occurred that per language involvement might also be
worth thinking about.
>In other words, the TC isn't making the technical decisions among
>themselves, but just prompting and continuing the discussion on
>xml-dev and doing the editing of the specs.
Since there are 3 volunteers, maybe that's enough for a handover? In other
words, if anyone wants in or isn't happy with this, now is a good time to
pipe up.
-Bill de hÓra
|