[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 08:01:40 -0500
This is confusing. The problem of mime types
for the metalanguage has been discussed for
a long time now, even when XML itself was
being specified and prior to that when
it was proposed that SGML application
languages be specified as notations. What
issues have held up work in this area?
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk]
You're absolutely right that as it stands text/xml is much too blunt
an instrument. I believe Makoto and others are labouring with the
IETF to make it so more detail can be specified.
|
