[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:03:05 -0500
I know. Same results. Bigger bang.
The problem is, was it the right target.
The problem of semantic nets are QOS
numbers and authority. Legitimacy of
source and right of access.
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@reutershealth.com]
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> I always felt that feeding them
> automagically from services such as full-text
> indexing and analysis was dicey. If you
> use semantic nets to create semantic nets, it
> is a bit like using an a-bomb to detonate
> an h-bomb.
Um, an A-bomb *is* what you use to detonate an H-bomb. In principle,
you could use another H-bomb, but there has to be an A-bomb somewhere
at the beginning.
So I'm not sure what you mean by your metaphors.
|
