[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com
- To: jamesr@steptwo.com.au, xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:16:45 -0400
Title: RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
James Robertson wrote:
> At 08:24 17/10/2000, Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com wrote:
>> In fact, Tim B-L strongly prefers to have two interoperable
>> implementations. It keeps the IETF people from snickering if something
>> goes wrong. The problem has to do with proving interoperability.
>> I think it would be healthy to see this as a formal requirement.
> I'm glad to here that _he_ "prefers" two
> interoperable implementations.
>
> He decided not to require this in the
> case of, say, XSL:FO?
It is on a case-by-case basis, as I understand it. And there are no formal test suites in most groups.
Jonathan
| 