[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com
- To: amyzing@talsever.com, cce@clarkevans.com, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:21:50 -0400
Title: RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
Amy Lewis wrote:
> Another view:
>
> 1) require that a candidate recommendation be accompanied by a
> conformance-determining test suite (hah! eXtreme Specifying,
> anyone?)
> 2) since W3C wishes to remain a vendor forum, adopt the
> principles of other vendor coalitions: no recommendation
> may *leave* candidate status until two member organizations
> have produced conformant (see 1), interoperable implementations.
Yep. I would certainly be in favor of that.
Jonathan
|
