xml-dev - Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)

Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 11:30:19 -0500 (EST)

Simon St.Laurent writes:

 > Sounds like it was a very good thing that the SGML Editorial Review Board
 > transmogrified into the XML Working Group, or we might have people
 > complaining that XML itself commits these very crimes against SGML.

Exactly -- that's why the new name was so important.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

References:
- Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
  - From: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
- Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Dangers of De Facto (WAS RE: Dangers of Subsetting?)
Next by Date: Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
Previous by thread: Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
Next by thread: Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread