xml-dev - Re: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.

Re: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

From: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@bbglobex.com>
To: xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:52:06 -0500

*sigh* "it shouldn't" instead of "is should" in #1...

---
Seairth Jacobs
seairth@bbglobex.com

1) XML is a standard that should be conformed to 100% in parsers. If it isn't going to be, then is should be called an "XML Parser"....

References:
- Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.
  - From: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@bbglobex.com>

Prev by Date: Re: xslt
Next by Date: Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
Previous by thread: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.
Next by thread: RE: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS