xml-dev - RE: Why not canonical parsers? [Was: Pull-based XML parsers? ]

[Mike Brown <mbrown@corp.webb.net>]

John Cowan wrote:
> Ronald Bourret wrote:
> >    <A><[CDATA[ < ]]></A>
> > 
> > becomes:
> > 
> >    <A> < </A>
> 
> Nope, Canonical XML is fully parsable XML: in this case it would be:
> 
> 	<A> &amp; </A>

Now that's quite a transformation! :)

   - Mike
____________________________________________________________________
Mike J. Brown, software engineer at         My XML/XSL resources:
webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA           http://www.skew.org/xml/