[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>, Michel Rodriguez <mrodrigu@ieee.org>,xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:38:57 -0600
Hmm. Can you conceive of a case or implementation
where SOAP message payloads might be XML wrapping
SQL queries? Offhand, that would seem to be something one
might want to do without having to know that the
consumer is a particular vendor's database. We
have to do that *sort* of thing using LU2.6(?) protocol
here for NCIC and state CIBs.
Wouldn't wrapped SQL be an improvement? Otherwise,
aren't we going to see a lot of vendor-specific
dialects FOR XML in SQL? Actually, I think that is
exactly the kind of problem that Consortiums can
address successfully since in essence it deals
directly with interoperability and extensions.
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Rys [mailto:mrys@microsoft.com]
There is currently no standardization of the mechanism for various reasons.
The SQL community is now starting to investigate XML related issues to
standardize.
I do not think that it is the W3C's role to issue recommendation on
relational database specific technology, but then again, I may be wrong on
this....
|