[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com>,xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:04:23 -0600
You might drop a level and inquire into
generic modes. It seems to me that mode are
one of the more powerful and simply applied features
of XSLT, and generalizable. A TOC is a TOC in the
abstract. Modes are fascinating in their own
right because they are a naming property that seems to
press on the boundary issues of sharing semantics.
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com]
I suspect that there are probably classes of transformations that are the
bread and butter transformations used in particular domains. What would be
a good way to identify a set of such domains and the transformations
generally used in them?
|
