Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Marcus Carr <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Paul Tchistopolskii <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:54:08 +1100
Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:
> 1. I was under impression that expressive power of schemas is
> greater than expressive power of DTDs. If this is right - it think
> it *should* really matter.
We may be looking at this from different perspectives - for me, a scalable
DTD/schema is one that takes potential future requirements into account without
causing an excessive negative impact on the current project. This is really a
design consideration and might be made before the decision to use DTDs or schemas
is even settled.
> That's why I want to see actual DTDs. I'm wondering how convinient
> is this trick in the real-life. I think #define's juggling was not convinient
> for complex cases. That's why we don't need #defines in C++ .
We did it for a suite of 25 DTDs for the Australian Department of Defence CALS
initiative some years ago, but I can't find a link to it - I think their server is
down (possibly not a good thing...). Also, that was SGML. :-)
Marcus Carr email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."