[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 11:59:33 -0800
A quick search turned up this archived posting from David Vun Kannon:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xpath-comments/1999JulSep/0040.html
Excerpt from first paragraph:
All of the armamentarium and impedimenta of the XML arsenal,
especially pointing, linking, the DOM and transformation, cannot be
brought to bear on XPath expressions because they are not in XML
syntax.
...and a little later in the message:
While the up-translation of XPath to an XML syntax can be undertaken
by individuals in an ad hoc way, and suited only to their own
purposes, I believe that it would benefit the XML-using community at
large if there was an officially sanctioned way to describe XPath
expressions in an XML instance syntax. The use of such a syntax
would be optional, just as the use of the full or abbreviated syntax
is a matter of choice.
|