Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Paul Tchistopolskii <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:53:43 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Bray <email@example.com>
> At 04:16 PM 27/12/00 -0800, Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:
> >What particular place in that document answers to my question ?
> >The only sentence which seems relevant is :
> >[Definition:] The attribute's value, a URI reference
> That's all you need. The term "URI reference" is clearly
> defined by the RFCs referenced in the document, and
> implies a set of syntax rules. -Tim
Right. It does. Let's replace http: with namespace: then
replace every '/' with '.' or do something else that will conform
to that paper ( I have no understanding why namespace
name should be conformant to URI, but ... oh... well...
I trust you: you say : "It should be URI, with scheme:
and other stuff for some holy reasons" - let it be. But
why it is *URL* ? )
PS. I think you'r joking on me.
So here is a document:
The term 'URI reference' is not defined in this document, but
the document reffers to RFC2396. There is no
hyperliks pointing to actual location of RFC2396.
I had to use Google to find this RFC.
Before W3C will build a Semantic Web - is there any chance
I can find core W3C documents not using Google ?