[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ANN] W3C SOAP Digital Signature
- From: Jacek Kopecky <email@example.com>
- To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com>,firstname.lastname@example.org, SOAP@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:11:41 +0100 (CET)
I'm responding here to the announcement of "SOAP Security
Extensions: Digital Signature" W3C note.
Great to see things are getting done, err, I mean specified. 8-)
Just a little curious remark: why didn't they just add the
SOAP-ENV:actor and SOAP-ENV:mustUnderstand attributes to the
The SOAP-SEC namespace also introduces the SOAP-SEC:id attribute to
help applications recognize attributes of type ID, that's good, but I
think that such an attribute should be added to SOAP (and I hope it
will be in XP) so that we don't end up having every extension to
SOAP/XP carry their own ID attribute.
Let's relieve the world of (IMHO) superfluous specs.
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, James Snell wrote:
> btw... congrats on getting this done. I'm looking forward to the Axis
> implementation of this.
> - James
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yuhichi Nakamura [mailto:NAKAMURY@jp.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 4:28 AM
> > To: email@example.com
> > Subject: [ANN] W3C SOAP Digital Signature
> > Folks,
> > SOAP Security Extensions: Digital Signature
> > has been published on W3C site as follows:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP-dsig/
> > My colleagues are involved as authors. Therefore we could
> > provide proper implementation of SOAP digital signature.
> > You can find implementation in trlsoap and trl-proposal
> > in axis cvs. I think that the implementation should be
> > complient with the specification except for signature for
> > attachments.
> > p.s. I just came back to my office from three day off.
> > I am catching up with the discussion here.
> > Best regards,
> > Yuhichi Nakamura
> > IBM Research, Tokyo Research Laboratory
> > Tel: +81-46-215-4668
> > FAX: +81-46-215-7413