Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, K.Kawaguchi
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Paul Tchistopolskii
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, James Clark
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Paul Tchistopolskii
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Thomas B. Passin
    • RELAX + Schematron, K.Kawaguchi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, James Clark
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, K.Kawaguchi
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, James Clark
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, K.Kawaguchi
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Norman Walsh
      • Type-assignment in one pass, K.Kawaguchi
      • Re: Type-assignment in one pass, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Type-assignment in one pass, K.Kawaguchi
      • Re: Type-assignment in one pass, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Type-assignment in one pass, K.Kawaguchi
      • Re: Type-assignment in one pass, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, James Clark
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, James Clark
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Leigh Dodds
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Charles Reitzel
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Charles Reitzel
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Miloslav Nic
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Charles Reitzel
• RE: On RDDL: cool! some ideas requests for help, Jonathan Borden
• XML versus Relational Database, Dream Catcher
  • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Caroline Clewlow
    • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Benjamin Franz
      • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Linda Grimaldi
  • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Matt Sergeant
  • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Soumitra Sengupta
    • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Michael Beddow
  • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Kimbro Staken
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Mike.Champion
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Frank Richards
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: XML versus Relational Database, K. Ari Krupnikov
    • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Linda Grimaldi
  • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Charles Reitzel
  • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: XML versus Relational Database, K. Ari Krupnikov
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Dylan Walsh
    • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Kimbro Staken
      • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Soumitra Sengupta
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Linda Grimaldi
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Terje Norderhaug
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Dylan Walsh
    • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Benjamin Franz
      • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Linda Grimaldi
    • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Kimbro Staken
      • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Ken North
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: XML versus Relational Database, John Cowan
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Bob Kline
    • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Linda Grimaldi
      • Request for info about parser construction details., Jose Luis Sierra Rodriguez
      • Re: Request for info about parser construction details., Matt Sergeant
      • re: Request for info about parser construction details., David Megginson
  • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Jay Zhang
    • Re: XML versus Relational Database, Kimbro Staken
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Mike.Champion
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Vegt, Jan
  • RE: XML versus Relational Database, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Resolution of PUBLIC ID, Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)
• Re: SQL Constraints (was "losing out 'cuz 'o grammar"), Charles Reitzel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SQL Constraints (was "losing out 'cuz 'o grammar"), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• MS ServerXMLHTTP Object, Jon Ceanfaglione
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MS ServerXMLHTTP Object, Jim Ancona
• ANNOUNCE ::KNOWLEDGE TECHNOLOGIES 2001 ANNOUNCES LOTUS, REUTERS,CYCORP AND XML.COM, Elledge, Marion
• AAAGH! (Was RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• (slight correction) Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, K.Kawaguchi
• Type-assignment (was Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?), Murata Makoto
  • Re: Type-assignment, K.Kawaguchi
    • Re: Type-assignment, Murata Makoto
      • Re: Type-assignment, K.Kawaguchi
      • Re: Type-assignment, Murata Makoto
      • Re: Type-assignment, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
      • Re: Type-assignment, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
      • Re: Type-assignment, Murata Makoto
      • Re: Type-assignment, K.Kawaguchi
  • Re: Type-assignment (was Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?), James Clark
    • Re: Type-assignment (was Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?), Murata Makoto
    • Re: Type-assignment (was Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?), Murata Makoto
      • Re: Type-assignment (was Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?), K.Kawaguchi
    • Re: Type-assignment (was Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?), K.Kawaguchi
• (Off-topic) Re: Type-assignment (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?), Rick Jelliffe
• Call For Papers - PDPTA'2001 / Session: XML and DistributedApplications, Fabio Arciniegas A.
• (Correction) Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: (Correction) Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, James Clark
    • Re: (Correction) Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Francis Norton
    • Re: (Correction) Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Francis Norton
    • Rules & Grammars, Tim Bray
      • re: Rules & Grammars, David Megginson
      • Re: Rules & Grammars, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: (Correction) Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: (Correction) Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Martin Bryan
• Referring to other documents, Charles Allen
• XML Information Set enters Last Call, Paul Grosso
• Choice in Systems Evolution (Was RE: Type-assignment in one pass), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Announce: SOAP 1.1 Validator Web App, Dave Winer
• RE: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage of RELA X incomparison to Schemas?, Jeff Lowery
• help me out!!!, ubvarma
• Blowout, Rick Jelliffe
  • Off Topic: Pathalogical, Clark C. Evans
    • Off Topic: Pathological, Clark C. Evans
    • Re: Off Topic: Pathalogical, Robin Berjon
    • Re: Off Topic: Pathalogical, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Off Topic: PathOlogical, Clark C. Evans
  • Re: Blowout, Joe English
    • Re: Blowout, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
• ANNOUNCE: XML in a Nutshell, Elliotte Rusty Harold
• XML DevCon 2001 (London) -- submit schemas and stylesheets, Ken North
• Re: Off Topic: Pathological, Rick Jelliffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Off Topic: Pathological, Jim Ancona
• AbstractMethodError, Joshua Yip
• RE: Off Topic: Pathalogical, David Hunter
• Announce: w3make, Stefan Kamphausen
• Ideal XML DB Features (was RE: XML versus Relational Database), Mike.Champion
• XML Document - DOCTYPE vs Schema NS, Jim Shain
  • Re: XML Document - DOCTYPE vs Schema NS, Jeff Rafter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Document - DOCTYPE vs Schema NS, Jim Shain
• A question in Apache SAX parser, Dongwook Shin
• The one element schema language (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?), Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: The one element schema language, Joe English
  • Re: The one element schema language, Joe English
• REMINDER: Days left for O'Reilly Open Source Conference XML CFP, Edd Dumbill
• Shannon revisited, Vegt, Jan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Shannon revisited, Bill dehOra
• RE: XML versus Relational Database ; what is what, Vegt, Jan
• RE: XML versus Relational Database ; future, Vegt, Jan
  • XML Query Languages, Claudio Hessel Peixoto Gomes
• XML/Schema-Editors TurboXML vs. XMLSpy, Inga Eckermann
• Extreme Markup Language - Date Change, B. Tommie Usdin
• Re: The one element schema language, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: The one element schema language, Joe English
• RE: XML Query Languages, Mike.Champion
  • Re: XML Query Languages, Ken North
• XML Parser in Servlet Performance Problem, Jeff Lansing
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML Parser in Servlet Performance Problem, Jeff Lansing
  • Re: XML Parser in Servlet Performance Problem, Jeff Lansing
• XML to RDBMS Mapping Methods, Kim, Kyungcheol
  • Re: XML to RDBMS Mapping Methods, Ken North
• presentations from XML Excursion Geek Cruise, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: presentations from XML Excursion Geek Cruise, Matt Sergeant
• Microsoft's XMLReader, Andrés Aguiar
  • Re: Microsoft's XMLReader, Aleksander Slominski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Microsoft's XMLReader, Andrés Aguiar
• standards among the IP detritus, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: standards among the IP detritus, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: standards among the IP detritus, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: standards among the IP detritus, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: standards among the IP detritus, Michael Fitzgerald
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: standards among the IP detritus, Michael Fitzgerald
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Sean McGrath
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Rules & Grammars, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Rules & Grammars, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Rules & Grammars, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Rules & Grammars, Miloslav Nic
  • Re: Rules & Grammars, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Rules & Grammars, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• best markup practices, different communities, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: best markup practices, different communities, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: best markup practices, different communities, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• FW: Proposal for HumanML discussion, Karl Best
• Re: There can be only one! (was are we losing our grammar?), Charles Reitzel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: There can be only one! (was are we losing our grammar?), Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Request for info about parser construction details., Rick Jelliffe
• History Part Quatre: Keeping Decisions In Scope (Was: Re: Reques tfor info about parser construction details), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Any order (Re: best markup practices, different communities), Rick Jelliffe
• Sun's use of "XML RPC", Dave Winer
• RE: Question regarding use of FOP, Gael G De Barbeyrac
• Re: History Part Quatre: Keeping Decisions In Scope (Was: Re: Requestfor info about parser construction details), Rick Jelliffe
• RE: History Part Quatre: Keeping Decisions In Scope (Was: Re: Re questfor info about parser construction details), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Using CDATA sections for element content??, Jerry Murray
  • Re: Using CDATA sections for element content??, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Using CDATA sections for element content??, Bob Kline
  • Re: Using CDATA sections for element content??, Ernest G. Allen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Using CDATA sections for element content??, Jerry Murray
  • Re: Using CDATA sections for element content??, Eric Bohlman
  • Re: Using CDATA sections for element content??, Eric Bohlman
• DOM vs JDOM, SNedunuri
  • Re: DOM vs JDOM, Tom Bradford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DOM vs JDOM, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: DOM vs JDOM, James Robertson
    • Re: DOM vs JDOM, Robin Berjon
  • Re: DOM vs JDOM, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: DOM vs JDOM, Rick Jelliffe
    • Announce: Quick 4.0.1 release fixes bugs, provides missing utilities, Bill la Forge
• Happy ending, Dave Winer
• RE:different communities III, Vegt, Jan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE:different communities III, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: different communities ; part I, Vegt, Jan
• RE: different communities ; part II, Vegt, Jan
• Open Source XML Editor, Matt Sergeant
  • Re: Open Source XML Editor, Matt Sergeant
  • Re: Open Source XML Editor, Bob Kline
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Danny Ayers
    • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Matt Sergeant
  • Re: Open Source XML Editor, Michael Smith
    • Re: Open Source XML Editor, Marcus Carr
      • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Danny Ayers
      • Re: Open Source XML Editor, Marcus Carr
      • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Danny Ayers
      • Re: Open Source XML Editor, Marcus Carr
    • Re: Open Source XML Editor, Matt Sergeant
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Open Source XML Editor, AndrewWatt2000
  • FW: Open Source XML Editor, Peter Jones
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Mike.Champion
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Frank Richards
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Danny Ayers
    • Re: Open Source XML Editor, Marcus Carr
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Tim McCune
    • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Danny Ayers
      • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Matt Sergeant
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Open Source XML Editor, Marcus Carr
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Open Source XML Editor, Marcus Carr
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Open Source XML Editor, Danny Ayers
• WWW Notes, Sean B. Palmer
  • Is someone aware on a bug of Xalan-J 2.0 with the following axis ?, Pierre Attar
    • Re: Is someone aware on a bug of Xalan-J 2.0 with the following axis ?, Eric van der Vlist
• Uniqueness operator for XPath?, Clark C. Evans
  • Re: Uniqueness operator for XPath?, David Carlisle
    • Information on updates to XML standards, Marek Kowalczyk
      • Re: Information on updates to XML standards, Jeff Rafter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Uniqueness operator for XPath?, Adam Van Den Hoven
• java code for retrieving node names and node values from DOM Tree, anand awasthi
• Re: Information on updates to XML standards, mrossi
  • Re: Information on updates to XML standards, Ken North
• [ANN] Free ebXML classes on April 9 (XML DevCon 2001, New York City), Ken North
• SAX question, Judi Thomson
  • Re: SAX question, Jeff Lansing
    • Re: SAX question, Judi Thomson
  • Re: SAX question, Rob Lugt
    • Re: SAX question, Judi Thomson
• [ANN] Free UDDI classes on April 10 (XML DevCon 2001, New York City), Ken North
• RE: different communities, Vegt, Jan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: different communities, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: different communities, Vegt, Jan
  • RE: different communities, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: different communities, Jack Park
• [XSLT] - Recognize an XML node, TIN
• XML Technology Review, ChrisDevich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Technology Review, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• User Profiles, Adam Van Den Hoven
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: User Profiles, Rick Jelliffe
• XPath calculation, Vakulenko, Andrey V
  • Re: XPath calculation, Robin Berjon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XPath calculation, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: XPath calculation, Simon St.Laurent
      • tree with xml, greg
  • Re: XPath calculation, Rick Jelliffe
• UML Mapping, Adam Van Den Hoven
  • Re: UML Mapping, Jeff Rafter
  • RE: UML Mapping, Michael Fitzgerald
  • Re: UML Mapping, Ken North
• Semantic Web, Michael Fitzgerald
• Anounce: Quick4 combines Java Data Modeling with an XML Binding Schema, Bill la Forge
• Restriction in XML Schema, Jay Zhang
• getting a xml file from oracle8i, Mushtaq Khan
  • Re: getting a xml file from oracle8i, Steve Muench
• XLink and XPointer support in browsers, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: XLink and XPointer support in browsers, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XLink and XPointer support in browsers, AndrewWatt2000
• RE: [ANN] W3C SOAP Digital Signature, Jacek Kopecky
• [RDDL] Nature, Purpose (and XSLT), Leigh Dodds
  • RE: [RDDL] Nature, Purpose (and XSLT), Jonathan Borden
    • RE: [RDDL] Nature, Purpose (and XSLT), Leigh Dodds
      • Re: [RDDL] Nature, Purpose (and XSLT), Sean B. Palmer
• [RDDL] API Suggestions, Leigh Dodds
• RDDL, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: RDDL, Jonathan Borden
    • RE: RDDL, Leigh Dodds
• [ANN] Free pass to "Which database solution?" and Joint BCS & XML UKdiscussion, Ken North
• FYI: Call for Implementation: XML Fragment Interchange, Paul Grosso
• Re: tree with xml, greg
  • RE: tree with xml, Danny Ayers
• [ANN] eXcelon Portal Server 3.0 Beta, Christopher Parkerson
• RTP, NC - USA: TriXML users group meeting, Kiel, Paul
• Validating RDDL, Aaron Swartz
  • Re: Validating RDDL, Jonathan Borden
• XML as an interface, stephen_lake
  • Re: XML as an interface, Caroline Clewlow
  • Re: XML as an interface, Bill la Forge
  • RE: XML as an interface, Danny Ayers
  • RE: XML as an interface, John F. Schlesinger
• TREX implementation updated, James Clark
• Schema Compression, Leigh Dodds
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Schema Compression, Rick Jelliffe
• WG: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schemas, Inga Eckermann
• Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schemas, Inga Eckermann
  • Re: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schemas, Robin Cover
    • Re: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schemas, Ken North
      • Re: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schemas, W. E. Perry
      • RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schemas, Danny Ayers
      • Re: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schemas, W. E. Perry
    • Re: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schemas, Dave Carlson
  • Re: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schemas, Dave Carlson
• unsubscribe, Nico Celliers
• RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schema s, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schema s, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schemas, W. E. Perry
    • RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schema s, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schema s, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schema s, Danny Ayers
  • RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schema s, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schema s, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schema s, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ?? for designing Schema s, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• HREFs in XSL, JoshMEagle
  • RE: HREFs in XSL, Florian G. Haas
    • Re: HREFs in XSL, Francis Norton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: HREFs in XSL, Evan Lenz
  • RE: HREFs in XSL, SNedunuri
    • Re: HREFs in XSL, Thomas B. Passin
    • RE: HREFs in XSL, Michael Fitzgerald
• Identity-constraint, Faroukh Fekravar
  • Re: Identity-constraint, Eddie Robertsson
    • Re: Identity-constraint, Faroukh Fekravar
• Attributes to show?, Ollikainen, Jari
  • Re: Attributes to show?, Mike Brown
• Why Model Concepts? (Was RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML o r ??for designing Schemas), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [Zvon] Multimodal views, Reference search, Site Map, XLab redesign, Miloslav Nic
• Re: Why Model Concepts? (Was RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or ??for designing Schemas), Rick Jelliffe
  • Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why Model Concepts?), Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Why Model Concepts? (Was RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or UML or??for designing Schemas), Ken North
    • intertwined specs, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: intertwined specs, Tim Bray
      • Re: intertwined specs, Kimbro Staken
• RE: Why Model Concepts? (Was RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or U ML or ??for designing Schemas), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Getting The Pizza (Was Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why Model Concepts?)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Getting The Pizza (Was Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why Model Concepts?)), Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why Model Concepts?), Rick Jelliffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why Model Concepts?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Getting The Pizza (Was Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why Mode l Concepts?)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Getting The Pizza (Was Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why Mode l Concepts?)), Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Getting The Pizza (Was Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why Mode l Concepts?)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Getting The Pizza (Was Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why ModelConcepts?)), Rick Jelliffe
• RE: Getting The Pizza (Was Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why Mode lConcepts?)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XMLAsMetaAsYouWantaBe!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Survey for XML Schema CR-37: Default prefix for schema namespace, Arnold, Curt
• [ANN] More Info on eXcelon Portal Server 3.0 Beta, Christopher Parkerson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [ANN] More Info on eXcelon Portal Server 3.0 Beta, Christopher Parkerson
• Announce: "dexribe" technology, Manoj Acharya
• Compression, Danny Ayers
  • Re: Compression, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: Compression, Caroline Clewlow
      • RE: Compression, Danny Ayers
      • Re: Compression, Jon Cleaver
      • RE: Compression, Eugene Kuznetsov
  • RE: Compression, Danny Ayers
    • RE: Compression, Andrew Morrow
  • Re: Compression, Tom Bradford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Compression, SNedunuri
    • Re: Compression, Jon Cleaver
  • RE: Compression, SNedunuri
  • RE: Compression, Bill dehOra
• Re: Abbreviated Tag Names, Ruth Bergman
  • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names, Ken North
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names, Ken North
• Logic in SIX, Peter Jones
• About XML Compression and MPEG-7, Claude Seyrat
• XML Resources for Document Markup, Jon Ceanfaglione
  • Re: XML Resources for Document Markup, Lloyd G. Rasmussen
• Help needed !!!, RamMohan
• First public Working Draft of W3C XML Query Language, Jonathan Robie
• Public Comment Period for Digital Talking Book standard, Lloyd G. Rasmussen
• RE: Why Model Concepts? (Was RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or U MLor ??for designing Schemas), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: intertwined specs, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: intertwined specs, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: intertwined specs, Ben Trafford
      • RE: intertwined specs, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: intertwined specs, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: intertwined specs, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: intertwined specs, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: intertwined specs, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: intertwined specs, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: intertwined specs, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: intertwined specs, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: intertwined specs, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: intertwined specs, Michael Rys
  • RE: intertwined specs, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: intertwined specs, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: intertwined specs, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: intertwined specs, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: intertwined specs, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: intertwined specs, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: intertwined specs, Michael Rys
  • RE: intertwined specs, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: intertwined specs, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: intertwined specs, Charles Reitzel
  • RE: intertwined specs, Mike.Champion
• OASIS TC call for participation: TREX, Karl Best
• XPointer and the '729 patent, Eve L. Maler
  • Re: XPointer and the '729 patent, Ben Trafford
  • Re: XPointer and the '729 patent, Tim Bray
  • Re: XPointer and the '729 patent, Aaron Swartz
    • Re: XPointer and the '729 patent, Steven J. DeRose
      • RE: XPointer and the '729 patent, David LeBlanc
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XPointer and the '729 patent, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: XPointer and the '729 patent, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: XPointer and the '729 patent, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: XPointer and the '729 patent, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Natural Motions (was Re: intertwined specs), Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Natural Motions (was Re: intertwined specs), Simon St.Laurent
• XML/C++ Integration tools, ChrisDevich
  • RE: XML/C++ Integration tools, David Santamauro
    • Re: XML/C++ Integration tools, ChrisDevich
      • RE: XML/C++ Integration tools, David Santamauro
• Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Charles Reitzel
  • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Olivier Dubuisson
      • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Olivier Dubuisson
      • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Olivier Dubuisson
      • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Olivier DUBUISSON
    • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Peter Jacobi
      • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Tim Bray
  • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Olivier Dubuisson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Charles Reitzel
    • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names (ASN.1), Olivier Dubuisson
• SAX InputSource and character streams, Mike Brown
  • Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, Rob Lugt
    • Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, Mike Brown
    • Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, David Brownell
      • Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, Rob Lugt
      • Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: SAX InputSource and character streams, Mike Brown
• Full Program for XML Europe 2001 now available -- Register by 14 Marchfor special discounts!, Elledge, Marion
• XSD Schema : Standard APIs ?, Simon Fell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • XSD Schema : Standard APIs ?, Simon Fell
    • Re: XSD Schema : Standard APIs ?, Martin Gudgin
      • Re: XSD Schema : Standard APIs ?, Simon Fell
  • RE: XSD Schema : Standard APIs ?, Mike.Champion
  • RE: XSD Schema : Standard APIs ?, Michael Rys
• Inheritance and Identity-constraint, Faroukh Fekravar
  • Re: Inheritance and Identity-constraint, Claude Seyrat
• Article (part of column) on XML & Semantics, Uche Ogbuji
  • [ANN] XSLT tutorial, Henning Behme
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Article (part of column) on XML & Semantics, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Article (part of column) on XML & Semantics, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: Article (part of column) on XML & Semantics, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Article (part of column) on XML & Semantics, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Article (part of column) on XML & Semantics, Clark C. Evans
• ANN: 4Suite and 4Suite Server 0.10.2, Uche Ogbuji
• Passing thru html to the browser, Praveen Shenoy
  • Re: Passing thru html to the browser, Thomas B. Passin
  • Message not available
    • Re: Passing thru html to the browser, Praveen Shenoy
      • Re: Passing thru html to the browser, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: Passing thru html to the browser, Jeff Rafter
• ANN: Information Validation (check.theinfo.org), Aaron Swartz
• Status of Data Islands, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Status of Data Islands, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Status of Data Islands, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• REMINDER: OASIS TC call for participation: Business Transactions, Karl Best
• new OASIS discussion list : XACML, Karl Best
• XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Bob Kline
  • SAX2 - Entity References, Tim Shaw
  • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Thomas B. Passin
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Joe English
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Uche Ogbuji
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Uche Ogbuji
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Michael Rys
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Charles Reitzel
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Michael Rys
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
      • Announce Quick4.0.3, Bill la Forge
  • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Brian Miller
    • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Marcus Carr
  • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Brian Miller
      • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Ben Trafford
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, John F. Schlesinger
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Brian Miller
      • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Ben Trafford
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
    • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Thomas B. Passin
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Ray Whitmer
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jim Ancona
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Michael Rys
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Gerd Mueller
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Clark C. Evans
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan Robie
  • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Michael Rys
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Michael Rys
  • Re: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Uche Ogbuji
• No Subject, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re:, Kimbro Staken
    • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: XQuery -- Reinventing the Wheel?, Evan Lenz
• XSLT Performance (was BLANK), Lynda VanVleet
  • Re: XSLT Performance (was BLANK), Brian Miller
    • RE: XSLT Performance (was BLANK), Eugene Kuznetsov
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XSLT Performance (was BLANK), Rick Jelliffe
    • XML and Queries (not XQL), sellberg
    • Re: XSLT Performance (was BLANK), Miloslav Nic
  • Re: XSLT Performance (was BLANK), Uche Ogbuji
    • RE: XSLT Performance (was BLANK), John F. Schlesinger
      • RE: XSLT Performance (was BLANK), Lynda VanVleet
  • RE: XSLT Performance (was BLANK), Jonathan.Robie
• Embedding RDF metadata within an XML document, Warren Hedley
  • Re: Embedding RDF metadata within an XML document, Dave Beckett
  • Re: Embedding RDF metadata within an XML document, Warren Hedley
  • Re: Embedding RDF metadata within an XML document, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Embedding RDF metadata within an XML document, Rick Jelliffe
• Food for thoughts, Arnaud Sahuguet
• RE: XML and Queries (not XQL), Jonathan.Robie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML and Queries (not XQL), Michael Rys
  • RE: XML and Queries (not XQL), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML and Queries (not XQL), Jonathan.Robie
  • RE: XML and Queries (not XQL), Michael Rys
• Why not reinventing the wheel ?, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Why not reinventing the wheel ?, David Rosenborg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why not reinventing the wheel ?, Jonathan Robie
• Generic XML Data Request to Explict SQL Statement, Jim Pinkelman
• [ANN] Looking for a XSLT debugger?, Christopher Parkerson
• Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Charles Reitzel
  • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Clark C. Evans
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Jonathan Robie
    • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Joe English
  • RE: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Jonathan Robie
    • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Joe English
      • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Jonathan Robie
  • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Charles Reitzel
    • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Thomas B. Passin
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Vasileios Papadimos
      • RE: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Evan Lenz
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Vasileios Papadimos
    • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Jonathan Robie
  • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Charles Reitzel
    • Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?, Jay Zhang
• XQuery and XSLT - Five Year from Now, Jay Zhang
  • Re: XQuery and XSLT - Five Year from Now, Benjamin Franz
• Can a stream other than the uri and file be passed to the parse methodin SAX ???, Sandeep
  • Re: Can a stream other than the uri and file be passed to the parsemethodin SAX ???, Rob Lugt
• Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Sean McGrath
  • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, W. E. Perry
    • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Sean McGrath
      • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Ben Trafford
    • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Robin Cover
      • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, W. E. Perry
  • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Brian Miller
  • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Joe English
  • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Tim Bray
    • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Sean McGrath
    • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Francis Norton
  • RE: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XQuery's FLWR expression vs. XSLT down-reference pull, Evan Lenz
• Type Derivation by Restriction, Winkowski, Daniel
  • Re: Type Derivation by Restriction, Henry S. Thompson
• Cross Posting to XML Query Comments (was Re: XQuery's FLWR expressionvs. XSLT down-reference pull), Jonathan Robie
• XQuery: is FLWR a <xsl:foreach/> ?, Jonathan Robie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XQuery: is FLWR a <xsl:foreach/> ?, Charles Reitzel
• Adding types to XPath, Matt Sergeant
  • Re: Adding types to XPath, Christopher R. Maden
    • Re: Adding types to XPath, Matt Sergeant
• XQuery - The truth comes out!, Evan Lenz
  • Re: XQuery - The truth comes out!, Jonathan Robie
    • Re: XQuery - The truth comes out!, Evan Lenz
      • Re: XQuery - The truth comes out!, Jonathan Robie
      • RE: XQuery - The truth comes out!, Evan Lenz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XQuery - The truth comes out!, Mike.Champion
    • Re: XQuery - The truth comes out!, Steve Muench
      • Re: XQuery - The truth comes out!, Jonathan Robie
• CodeML?, robert sanford
  • Re: CodeML?, Aaron Swartz
  • Message not available
    • Re: CodeML?, Jeff Turner
  • Re: CodeML?, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: CodeML?, Lisa Rein
  • Re: CodeML?, Matt Sergeant
    • RE: CodeML?, Didier PH Martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CodeML?, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: CodeML?, Richard Lanyon
  • Re: CodeML?, rsanford
    • Re: CodeML?, Richard Lanyon
• XML DevCon Plenary talk on Infoset available in HTML, Henry S. Thompson
  • Marketing XML?, Darryn Sneller
    • Message not available
      • Re: Marketing XML?, Edd Dumbill
• Extreme Markup Languages 20001, B. Tommie Usdin
• XML Querying Alternatives (was RE: XQuery - The truth comes out!), Mike.Champion
  • Re: XML Querying Alternatives (was RE: XQuery - The truth comes out!), Steve Muench
• Re: Optimization and XPath (was RE: Why not reinvent the wheel?), Charles Reitzel
• [Zvon] References: DOM 2 ; DOM 1 Upgrade, Miloslav Nic
• Reinventing the wheel (an implementor point of view), Arnaud Sahuguet
  • Re: Reinventing the wheel (an implementor point of view), Brian Miller
    • Re: Reinventing the wheel (an implementor point of view), Robin Berjon
• Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Tim Bray
  • re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, David Megginson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Edd Dumbill
  • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Michael Smith
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Don Park
    • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, David Megginson
  • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Ron Whitney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, James Robertson
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Benjamin Franz
      • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Sean B. Palmer
      • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Benjamin Franz
      • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Christopher R. Maden
    • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Frank Richards
      • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, James Robertson
      • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Frank Richards
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, James Robertson
      • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Tim Bray
      • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, James Robertson
      • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Tim Bray
      • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, David Megginson
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Mike.Champion
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Benjamin Franz
      • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Paul T
      • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, John Cowan
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Mike.Champion
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
    • XML Java Parser..., AMIT JAIN
      • Re: XML Java Parser..., Mike Brown
    • : XML Schemas: Best Practices, Christian Nentwich
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Francis Norton
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Eddie Robertsson
• XML Article: Please review;, Newsha Makooi
• ANN: B-Bop Releases Xfinity(TM) Author wX 1.2, Soumitra Sengupta
• The relentless march of abstraction, Dave Winer
  • re: The relentless march of abstraction, David Megginson
    • Re: The relentless march of abstraction, Dave Winer
      • RE: The relentless march of abstraction, Don Park
      • Re: The relentless march of abstraction, John Cowan
  • Re: The relentless march of abstraction, Tim Bray
    • RE: The relentless march of abstraction, Lynda VanVleet
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The relentless march of abstraction, Dave Winer
  • Re: The relentless march of abstraction, Dave Winer
    • Re: The relentless march of abstraction, John Cowan
  • RE: The relentless march of abstraction, Eric Bohlman
  • RE: The relentless march of abstraction, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: The relentless march of abstraction, Ken North
• Linear time XML treediff, Christian Nentwich
  • Re: Linear time XML treediff, Bob Kline
    • Re: Linear time XML treediff, Christian Nentwich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Linear time XML treediff, Christian Nentwich
• Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?, Rob Lugt
  • Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?, John Cowan
    • Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?, Rob Lugt
  • Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?, Christopher R. Maden
    • Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?, Rob Lugt
    • Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?, Tim Bray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?, Michael Rys
    • Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?, John Cowan
      • Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?, Rob Lugt
• Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), John Cowan
  • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), David Megginson
    • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Tim Bray
      • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), David Megginson
      • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Robin Berjon
      • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Matt Sergeant
      • RE: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Don Park
      • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Dave Winer
    • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Robin Berjon
      • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Dave Winer
  • RE: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: client side XML (was The relentless march of abstraction), Charles Reitzel
• Where's the Dublin Core when you need one?, Dave Winer
• SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Justin Couch
  • Re: SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Justin Couch
      • Re: SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Tim Shaw
    • Re: SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Justin Couch
  • RE: SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: SAX-ext Attribute + Entity Parsing, Tim Shaw
• <xinclude> & unimplementable specs, Kevin Burges
• test, Sean Kim
• fixed attribute values in Schemas, LKirschner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • fixed attribute values in Schemas, LKirschner
• fixed attributes in Schemas, LKirschner
• sorry for all the posts; network/email problems, LKirschner
• SAX2: Missing isSpecified show-stops DOM building, Ingo Macherius
  • re: SAX2: Missing isSpecified show-stops DOM building, David Megginson
    • re: SAX2: Missing isSpecified show-stops DOM building, Robin Berjon